are validated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are validated with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of confirming or verifying something through a specific method or criteria. Example: "The results of the experiment are validated with statistical analysis to ensure their accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The proposed regenerative seat suspension and its controller are validated with both simulations and experiments.

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

The simulations are validated with experimental data.

Applied Thermal Engineering

The simulated results are validated with experiments.

Energy and Buildings

The numerical results are validated with experiments.

Combustion and Flame

Results are validated with approximate analytic solutions.

Journal of Computational Physics

Simulations are validated with available experimental data.

Chemical Engineering Science

Numerical models are validated with the experimental results.

International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering

The numerical results are validated with the experimental cutting tests.

Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Modern Processes

The simulation studies are validated with the experimental results.

Renewable Energy

The simulation results are validated with reported experimental data.

Applied Thermal Engineering

The calculated results are validated with experimental data.

Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are validated with" to indicate that results, models, or theories have been rigorously tested and confirmed using specific data, methods, or standards. This phrase adds credibility to your claims and demonstrates adherence to established practices.

Common error

Avoid using "are validated with" in informal or general writing where simpler alternatives like "are confirmed by" or "are supported by" would be more appropriate. This phrase is most effective in scientific, technical, and academic contexts where precision and rigor are expected.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are validated with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has undergone a process of verification or confirmation using specific methods, data, or evidence. This is supported by examples found in Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are validated with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and technical writing. According to Ludwig AI, it signifies that findings or results have undergone a verification process, enhancing their credibility. While highly appropriate in formal and scientific contexts, it should be used judiciously in more casual settings. Alternatives such as "are confirmed by" or "are supported by" may be more suitable for general use. The examples curated by Ludwig highlight the phrase's prominence in academic and research publications, confirming its status as a valuable tool for conveying rigor and reliability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are confirmed by

Focuses on confirmation as opposed to validation; suggests a direct confirmation rather than a process.

are verified by

Emphasizes the verification aspect, indicating that something is proven to be true or accurate through examination.

are supported by

Highlights that something is backed up or reinforced by evidence or data.

are corroborated by

Suggests strengthening or confirming an account or evidence with additional support.

are substantiated by

Implies providing evidence to support the truth of something.

are justified by

Focuses on showing or proving something to be right or reasonable.

are authenticated through

Highlights the establishment of genuineness.

are demonstrated through

Highlights the showcasing or proving through actions or examples.

align with

Indicates that the results match or are in agreement with something else.

are in agreement with

Suggests the presence of concordance between multiple things.

FAQs

How can I use "are validated with" in a sentence?

Use "are validated with" to indicate that certain findings or results have been confirmed through specific data or methods. For example: "The simulation results "are validated with" experimental data."

What are some alternatives to "are validated with"?

Alternatives include "are confirmed by", "are verified by", or "are supported by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "are validated with"?

"Are validated with" is particularly suitable in technical, scientific, or academic writing, where rigorous confirmation through data or experimentation is essential. It emphasizes the reliability and accuracy of the results.

Is there a difference between "are validated with" and "are verified with"?

While both phrases imply confirmation, "are validated with" often suggests a more comprehensive process involving multiple steps and data sources, whereas "are verified with" might refer to a more straightforward checking process.