are verified with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are verified with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of confirming or validating information or data with a specific source or method. Example: "The results of the experiment are verified with multiple trials to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These are verified with a nominal transaction.

The Economist

Simulated results are verified with experimental results.

Measurement

Simulated results are verified with measured results.

AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications

Analytical results are verified with numerical simulations.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The analysis results are verified with the test results.

Case Studies in Structural Engineering

Failure locations are verified with physical failure analysis.

Microelectronics Reliability

Simulated current-voltage characteristics are verified with experimental results.

Organic Electronics

Analytically obtained stress fields are verified with FE results.

Mechanics of Materials

Results are verified with simulations on the HUGIN 1000 AUV.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

The results of this model are verified with experiments.

Fire Safety Journal

The simulation results are verified with experimental studies.

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are verified with", ensure that the source of verification is clearly stated to maintain transparency and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "are verified with" without specifying what is being used for verification. For example, instead of saying "The results are verified with", specify "The results are verified with experimental data" to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are verified with" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that something is being validated or confirmed using a specific method, data, or source. As Ludwig AI indicates, this usage is correct and usable in written English. Examples show this is often used in scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

97%

News & Media

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are verified with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly within scientific and technical domains, to denote validation processes. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is appropriate for formal writing. The examples pulled by Ludwig demonstrate its consistent application in academic research, emphasizing the importance of clearly specifying the methods or data used for verification. By ensuring clarity and precision in its usage, writers can effectively convey the credibility and reliability of their findings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are validated by

Replaces "verified" with "validated", emphasizing formal confirmation.

are confirmed by

Substitutes "verified" with "confirmed", suggesting a strengthening of belief in accuracy.

are substantiated by

Uses "substantiated" instead of "verified", indicating evidence supports the claim.

are corroborated by

Employs "corroborated" to highlight that multiple sources support the findings.

are supported by

Replaces "verified" with "supported", indicating backing from evidence or data.

align with

Expresses agreement or consistency, rather than direct verification.

are in agreement with

Similar to 'align with', but more emphatic in expressing concordance.

find support in

Indicates that the results or claims gain assistance or validation from the specified source.

are in accordance with

Focuses on compliance and conformity with established standards or results.

are demonstrated by

Highlights evidence and proof that establish validity.

FAQs

How to use "are verified with" in a sentence?

Use "are verified with" to indicate that certain results, findings, or data have been confirmed or validated by a specific source. For instance, "The simulation results "are verified with" experimental data."

What can I say instead of "are verified with"?

You can use alternatives like "are confirmed by", "are validated by", or "are supported by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "are verified with" or "are verified by"?

Both "are verified with" and "are verified by" are grammatically correct, but "are verified with" is often used when the verification involves a specific method, tool, or data set. "Are verified by" is broader and can refer to a person or an entity.

What's the difference between "are verified with" and "are compared with"?

"Are verified with" implies that something is being validated for accuracy or correctness, whereas "are compared with" simply means that two things are being assessed for similarities or differences without necessarily implying validation.