are the same for both

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "are the same for both" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when referring to two objects or concepts that have similarities. For example: "The rules of engagement are the same for both sides in the conflict."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The drivers are the same for both sectors.

The Guardian

"The conditions are the same for both teams," Robinson said.

The New York Times - Sports

No, the admission criteria are the same for both programs.

Columbia University

All lower division requirements are the same for both emphases.

University of California, Berkeley

The degree requirements are the same for both formats.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The following steps are the same for both systems.

Nature

Yes, the degree/credit requirements are the same for both MFin formats.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The degree requirements are the same for both the 12-month and 18-month formats.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The policies are the same for both types of Purchasing Cards, unless specifically noted.

Stanford University

The hosting costs and signup and launch processes are the same for both types of websites.

University of California, Berkeley

Many of the design and selection principles are the same for both.

Fundamentals of HVAC Control Systems

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are the same for both", ensure that the comparison is clear and that the two items being compared are explicitly mentioned to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are the same for both" when only one aspect is similar. Specify which aspects are identical to maintain accuracy and prevent misleading the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are the same for both" functions as a comparative expression, specifically used to indicate that two distinct entities share identical characteristics or attributes. Ludwig AI, confirming its correctness, showcases it to equate aspects across two subjects.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

Academia

29%

News & Media

21%

Less common in

Formal & Business

13%

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are the same for both" is a commonly used expression to denote equivalence or identical characteristics between two subjects. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts, particularly in scientific, academic, and news-related discussions. While it's essential to maintain clarity by explicitly specifying the entities being compared, this phrase provides a straightforward way to emphasize commonality. The top sources using this phrase include publications like The New York Times and BBC, reinforcing its broad applicability and reliability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

identical for both

Replaces "same" with a synonym that emphasizes exact correspondence.

equivalent for both

Substitutes "same" with a term denoting functional equality.

equal for both

Uses "equal" instead of "same", suggesting a shared measure or quantity.

consistent across both

Emphasizes uniformity between two items or conditions.

uniform for both

Suggests a standard or unchanging characteristic shared by two things.

alike for both

Replaces "same" with a simpler synonym indicating resemblance.

comparable for both

Indicates that the two items can be usefully compared because of shared characteristics.

the same across the board

Uses an idiomatic expression to indicate complete and universal sameness.

no difference between the two

Expresses sameness by negating any distinction.

both share the same

Changes the sentence structure to highlight the shared attribute.

FAQs

How can I use "are the same for both" in a sentence?

Use "are the same for both" to highlight shared characteristics between two distinct entities. For example: "The admission criteria "are the same for both programs"."

What phrases are similar to "are the same for both"?

Alternatives include "identical for both", "equivalent for both", or "equal for both", each with slightly different nuances.

Is it grammatically correct to say "is the same for both"?

No, the correct form depends on the subject. If referring to a plural subject, use "are". If referring to a singular subject, use "is the same for both". For example, "The process is the same for both" (referring to a singular process) or "The requirements are the same for both" (referring to plural requirements).

How does "are the same for both" compare to "similar for both"?

"Are the same for both" indicates an exact match, while "similar for both" implies some degree of resemblance but not necessarily identical features. For example, saying "The costs "are the same for both"" means the costs are identical. Saying "The costs are similar for both" suggests they are comparable but not exactly the same.