equal for both

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equal for both" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing fairness or equality in a situation involving two parties or groups. Example: "The terms of the agreement should be equal for both parties to ensure fairness."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They also conclude that tenofovir was more effective than entecavir, which is in contrast to our results for which the efficacy equality was equal for both drugs.

European Journal of Health Economics

They therefore set the values of those variables equal for both species.

The Economist

But after the bubble burst, Ericsson began reporting losses and, after 2001, stopped paying dividends, which had been equal for both classes of stock.

The New York Times

That's when [the risk-reward for] security-versus-injury are about equal for both sides," says a player who has a nine-figure contract.

The Washington Post

The parameters from the best fit DDM are shown in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3. Finally, non-decision times are often assumed to be equal for both choices.

Nature

A true model of an engineering situation is one for which all π quantities associated with the problem is equal for both the model and prototype.

Engineering Problem Solving A Classical Perspective

The conductance of the flow field plates have been calculated and found to be almost equal for both perforated and serpentine channel geometry.

Journal of the Energy Institute

Due to the requirement that the extended semiintegral should be equal for both geometries, four possible scenarios are examined to find the conditions that are optimal.

Electrochimica Acta

which is equal for both models.

The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience (JMN)

After the first 3 years, repeat interventions remained relatively equal for both treatment groups.

Duke University

Moreover, the bounds in (3 - 6) are equal for both regions.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer "equal for both" when emphasizing a direct and straightforward comparison between two items, especially in scientific or technical writing.

Common error

Avoid using "equal for both" when the situation requires equity, where the treatment needs to be fair based on individual needs rather than strictly identical. Ensure that applying "equal for both" does not inadvertently create or perpetuate disadvantages for any party involved.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equal for both" functions as a predicative adjective phrase. It describes a state of equivalence or sameness that applies to two distinct entities. Ludwig examples showcase its use in various contexts to assert parity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

74%

News & Media

15%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equal for both" is a versatile and frequently used expression for denoting equivalence between two entities. Ludwig AI affirms its grammatical correctness and widespread application across diverse fields such as science, news, and academia. When employing this phrase, prioritize clarity by explicitly stating the attribute being compared and remain mindful of scenarios necessitating equity over strict equality. For alternatives, consider "identical for both" or "the same for both" to achieve nuanced expression. "Equal for both" is a useful linguistic tool that is suitable for a variety of contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Identical for both

Uses "identical" to emphasize exact correspondence, suggesting a stricter level of equivalence than "equal".

The same for both

Replaces "equal" with "the same", offering a more colloquial way to express equivalence.

Equivalent for both

Substitutes "equal" with "equivalent", which implies functional sameness rather than exact identity.

Uniform for both

Suggests a consistent and standardized quality or characteristic shared between two entities.

Comparable for both

Implies a similarity that allows for comparison, suggesting they are alike in certain measurable aspects.

Consistent for both

Highlights a predictable pattern or standard that applies without variation to both entities.

Interchangeable for both

Highlights the possibility to use one instead of the other.

Analogous for both

Stresses a relationship or similarity in some respects, allowing an analogy to be drawn.

Commensurate for both

Emphasizes a proportional or corresponding relationship, often used in more formal contexts.

Matched for both

Suggests a deliberate pairing or alignment, indicating that the two entities have been specifically equated.

FAQs

How do I use "equal for both" in a sentence?

Use "equal for both" to indicate that something is the same or equivalent for two different subjects. For example, "The opportunities should be "equal for both" men and women".

What phrases can I use instead of "equal for both"?

Alternatives include "the same for both", "identical for both", or "equivalent for both". The choice depends on the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it more accurate to say "equal between" or "equal for"?

While "equal between" is acceptable, ""equal for both"" is more direct and commonly used when referring to two specific entities or groups.

When is it inappropriate to use "equal for both"?

It's inappropriate when equity is needed instead of strict equality. If the subjects have different needs or starting points, aiming for "equal for both" may not lead to a fair outcome.