equivalent for both

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equivalent for both" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that is the same or comparable for two different subjects or entities. Example: "The results of the experiment were equivalent for both groups, indicating that the treatment had a similar effect."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

47 human-written examples

One could nitpick at some off-base renditions, like giving flank steak as the equivalent for both bavette and onglet (onglet is hanger steak), or socca as a cornmeal cake (it's a crepe made with chickpea flour) and saying that grenouille, or frog, is pronounced gren-WE, not greh-noo-EE.

The New York Times - Food

Apparently, apart from the lighting conditions all the other environmental and weather conditions were equivalent for both time periods.

European Transport Research Review

Optimal values of the scalar parameter are β = 0.015 0.020, and equivalent for both cases of the 2011 Tohoku and the 2010 Chilean tsunamis.

Earth, Planets and Space

The optimal values seem equivalent for both giant tsunamis, and are relatively smaller than those previously verified for ocean tide modeling, which is reasonable because of the shorter wavelengths of tsunamis.

Earth, Planets and Space

Thermal properties like thermo stability, melting point, enthalpy, degree of crystallinity and glass transition temperature (Tg); and chemical resistance in different chemical media were found to be almost equivalent for both the polyurethanes.

Progress in Organic Coatings

For example, as noted here, Columbia's JD/MBA program tuition charges are roughly equivalent for both three-year and four-year students.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

13 human-written examples

Due to the fact that N2O generation is calculated on the basis of the applied N, a higher transfer of digestate nitrogen into nitrous oxide after fertilization is calculated to be 2.98: 0.8 = 3.73, where 2.98 is the N2O emission after the application in kg of CO2 equivalents for both kinds of fertilizer.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

Equivalents for both mTOR complexes exist in yeast [ 72, 73].

BMC Genomics

Since a transport reaction for NADH between the cytosol and mitochondria was included in the model, the pools of reducing equivalents for both compartments are balanced simultaneously.

BMC Biotechnology

The medal is presented annually by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the equivalent of the U.S. National Science Foundation, for "both the sustained excellence and the overall influence of research work conducted in Canada".

Science Magazine

It was found that MB knees more frequently required tibial augmentation in our sample population (P = 0.020), but overall surgical complexity was equivalent for revisions of both implant designs.

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "equivalent for both", ensure that the comparison is clearly defined and that the two entities being compared are explicitly stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "equivalent for both" implies complete similarity in all aspects. Clearly specify the parameters or features for which the equivalence holds true. This prevents misinterpretations and ensures accurate communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equivalent for both" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that something possesses a similar value, effect, or meaning across two distinct entities or conditions. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is used to establish comparability between two items.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "equivalent for both" is a versatile tool for establishing comparability between two distinct entities or conditions. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and frequently used. Its primary function is to highlight shared attributes, and it is most commonly found in scientific and news contexts. While variations like "equal for both" or "the same for both" can be used, it is crucial to specify the scope of equivalence to avoid ambiguity. By following these guidelines, writers can effectively and accurately use "equivalent for both" in their work.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the same for both

Replaces "equivalent" with "the same", emphasizing identical characteristics.

identical for both

Substitutes "equivalent" with "identical", highlighting an exact match.

equal for both

Uses "equal" instead of "equivalent", focusing on sameness in value or measure.

applicable to both

Shifts focus to the applicability rather than direct equivalence.

relevant to both

Emphasizes relevance rather than precise matching.

comparable for both

Indicates similarity to a degree that they can be compared.

consistent across both

Highlights the consistency of a characteristic across two instances.

mirrored in both

Implies a reflection or direct correspondence in two separate cases.

uniform for both

Suggests a standardized or unvarying nature across two items.

corresponding in both

Indicates a parallel or analogous relationship between two items.

FAQs

How can I use "equivalent for both" in a sentence?

Use "equivalent for both" to indicate that a specific attribute, value, or effect is the same or nearly the same for two distinct entities or conditions. For example, "The risk was "equivalent for both" groups in the study".

What are some alternatives to saying "equivalent for both"?

You can use phrases such as "the same for both", "identical for both", or "equal for both" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it more accurate to say "equal for both" or "equivalent for both"?

Both "equal for both" and ""equivalent for both"" are grammatically correct. "Equal" often refers to a precise mathematical or quantitative sameness, while "equivalent" can imply a functional or qualitative similarity.

In what contexts is "equivalent for both" most appropriately used?

"Equivalent for both" is suitable in contexts where you need to emphasize that a specific characteristic or outcome is similar across two different subjects, treatments, or conditions, particularly in scientific, technical, or analytical writing. The impact of using the phrase should be that the reader understands that the result or effect obtained from a test is "equivalent for both" conditions.