are not immune

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not immune" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something is susceptible to a particular influence, condition, or effect. Example: "Despite their efforts to stay healthy, they are not immune to the flu virus this season."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Scientists are not immune.

The New York Times

Mothers are not immune.

The New York Times

Presidents are not immune".

The Guardian

Journalists are not immune.

The New York Times

But Democrats are not immune.

The New York Times

Mac users are not immune.

The New York Times

Defenders are not immune, either.

The New York Times - Sports

Equity markets are not immune.

The New York Times

But men are not immune.

The Economist

Women leaders are not immune.

Independent

Democracies are not immune.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are not immune" to emphasize that something or someone is susceptible to a particular negative influence or condition, despite apparent strengths or safeguards.

Common error

Avoid using "are not immune" when a complete, rather than partial, susceptibility is implied; consider stronger terms if there's absolutely no defense or resistance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not immune" functions as a predicate adjective phrase, indicating a state of susceptibility or vulnerability. As Ludwig AI confirms, it effectively conveys that something or someone is not protected from a particular influence or condition. Ludwig's examples show its versatility in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Academia

14%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Science

14%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are not immune" is a versatile and commonly used expression that signifies a lack of protection or susceptibility to something. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically sound and appropriate for various contexts, ranging from news reports to academic discussions. While alternatives like "are vulnerable to" or "are susceptible to" exist, "are not immune" effectively conveys the idea that even seemingly strong entities can be affected by specific influences. Remember to use it when you want to highlight the lack of complete defense against a particular factor.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are susceptible to

Replaces the concept of immunity with direct susceptibility.

are vulnerable to

Emphasizes the potential for harm or negative impact.

are prone to

Suggests a tendency or likelihood of being affected.

are not resistant to

Directly counters the idea of resistance.

cannot avoid

Focuses on the inability to evade or escape something.

are defenseless against

Highlights the lack of defense mechanisms.

are open to

Implies a lack of barriers against something.

are subject to

Indicates being under the power or influence of something.

cannot escape

Emphasizes the inevitability of encountering something.

are at risk of

Highlights the potential danger or negative outcome.

FAQs

How can I use "are not immune" in a sentence?

Use "are not immune" to indicate that someone or something is susceptible to a particular influence or condition, even if they seem strong or protected. For example, "Even large corporations "are not immune" to economic downturns."

What are some alternatives to "are not immune"?

You can use alternatives like "are susceptible to", "are vulnerable to", or "are prone to" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is not immune" instead of "are not immune"?

Yes, "is not immune" is correct when referring to a singular subject, while "are not immune" is used for plural subjects or when referring to 'you'. For instance, "He "is not immune" to criticism" versus "They "are not immune" to criticism".

What's the difference between "are not immune" and "are resistant to"?

"Are not immune" implies a lack of protection or susceptibility, while "are resistant to" suggests some level of defense or ability to withstand, though not complete protection. "Are not immune" implies greater vulnerability.