are vulnerable to

USAGE SUMMARY

"are vulnerable to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to people or objects that are at risk of being adversely affected by certain things or conditions. For example: "Children are especially vulnerable to the effects of air pollution."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"They are vulnerable to exploitation".

The New York Times

However, they are vulnerable to surprise attacks.

The Economist

Smaller firms are vulnerable to shocks.

The Economist

But predictions are vulnerable to sabotage.

The Economist

But they are vulnerable to runs.

The New York Times

They are vulnerable to micrometeorite strikes.

The New York Times

All personnel policies are vulnerable to demography.

Encyclopedia Britannica

All three layers are vulnerable to attack.

Encyclopedia Britannica

They are vulnerable to corruption.

Cornell University

Tight muscles are vulnerable to cramping.

Harvard University

Ticks are vulnerable to heat and dehydration.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are vulnerable to", be specific about the potential threat or harm. This provides clarity and context to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "are vulnerable to" without specifying the potential danger. For instance, instead of saying "The system is vulnerable", specify "The system is vulnerable to cyber attacks".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are vulnerable to" functions as a predicative adjective phrase, describing a state of susceptibility or being at risk. It connects a subject to a condition where it is open to potential harm or negative influence. Ludwig provides numerous examples showcasing its widespread use across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

33%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are vulnerable to" is a versatile phrase used to express susceptibility to harm or negative influences. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and appropriate for various contexts, ranging from scientific research to news reports. When using this phrase, be specific about the potential threat to enhance clarity. While alternatives like "are susceptible to" or "are at risk of" exist, "are vulnerable to" maintains a neutral tone suitable for diverse audiences. It appears frequently in "Science", "News & Media", and "Academia", making it a widely recognized and accepted expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are susceptible to

This alternative is a direct synonym, expressing a similar level of openness to being affected.

are prone to

Implies a tendency or inclination towards something, often negative.

are at risk of

Focuses on the potential danger or harm that could occur.

are exposed to

Highlights the lack of protection and the presence of a threatening factor.

are liable to

Suggests a legal or formal responsibility, but can also refer to a general tendency.

are subject to

Indicates that something is under the control or influence of something else.

are open to

Emphasizes accessibility and lack of barriers, which can lead to vulnerability.

can be affected by

Focuses on the potential impact or influence of something.

leave themselves open to

Highlights the active role of someone making themselves vulnerable.

are defenseless against

Stresses the lack of ability to protect against something.

FAQs

How can I use "are vulnerable to" in a sentence?

Use "are vulnerable to" to indicate that someone or something is susceptible to harm or negative influences. For example, "Children are vulnerable to misinformation".

What's a good alternative to "are vulnerable to"?

Alternatives include "are susceptible to", "are prone to", or "are at risk of" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "are vulnerable to" or "are at risk from"?

Both "are vulnerable to" and "are at risk of" are correct, but "are vulnerable to" emphasizes susceptibility, while "are at risk of" highlights potential danger. The choice depends on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Can "are vulnerable to" be used in both formal and informal contexts?

Yes, "are vulnerable to" is appropriate in both formal and informal writing, though more formal alternatives like "are susceptible to" may be preferred in highly formal contexts.