with restrictions

USAGE SUMMARY

"with restrictions" is an appropriate phrase to use in written English.
You could use it to indicate that something is subject to certain limits or conditions. For example, "The library is open with restrictions due to the pandemic."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Proposition E comes with restrictions.

The New York Times

But the incentive comes with restrictions.

The New York Times

The site, however, comes with restrictions.

The New York Times

A dozen others allow them with restrictions.

The New York Times

Let's begin with restrictions on severance payouts.

The New York Times

With restrictions on informal dress and cellphones.

The New York Times

Why hem yourself in with restrictions?

The New York Times - Magazine

Lotronex will return, the agency said -- with restrictions.

The New York Times

I won't say with restrictions, but with monitoring".

The New York Times - Sports

Suffrage is extended to Hungarian women with restrictions.

The New Yorker

(Mr. Weingarten supports abortion rights, but with restrictions).

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with restrictions", clearly state what the restrictions are to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "Access is available with restrictions", specify "Access is available with restrictions on commercial vehicles".

Common error

Avoid using "with restrictions" without specifying what those restrictions entail. Unclear restrictions can lead to confusion and misinterpretation. Always provide explicit details.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with restrictions" primarily functions as an adverbial modifier, clarifying how an action, permission, or state is limited or conditioned. As Ludwig showcases, it modifies various elements, indicating constraints across different contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

7%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "with restrictions" is a versatile phrase used to indicate that something is subject to certain limits or conditions. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and very common across various contexts, especially in news, science, and encyclopedic sources. To use it effectively, always specify what the restrictions are to avoid vagueness. Alternatives include "subject to limitations" and "under certain conditions". Remember that Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's appropriateness in written English, highlighting its importance in clear and precise communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subject to limitations

Emphasizes the idea of being bound by certain constraints.

under certain conditions

Highlights the conditional aspect of the limitations.

with provisos

Uses a less common, more formal term for conditions or stipulations.

with qualifications

Focuses on specific requirements or conditions that must be met.

under specific constraints

Highlights the limited nature of the freedom or action.

within defined parameters

Indicates that actions or permissions fall within certain boundaries.

bound by limitations

Highlights that something is not free due to certain impositions.

dependent on stipulations

Focuses on the dependence of an action on specified stipulations.

with caveats

Implies warnings or considerations that must be taken into account.

subject to constraints

Emphasizes the external forces that are restricting something.

FAQs

How can I use "with restrictions" in a sentence?

You can use "with restrictions" to indicate that something is subject to certain limitations or conditions. For instance, "The park is open "with restrictions" due to the pandemic."

What are some alternatives to "with restrictions"?

Alternatives include phrases like "subject to limitations", "under certain conditions", or "with qualifications", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "with restrictions" or "with limitations"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and similar in meaning. The choice depends on the context and desired emphasis. "With restrictions" might imply more specific or formally imposed conditions, while "with limitations" can be more general.

Can "with restrictions" be used in both formal and informal writing?

"With restrictions" is suitable for both formal and informal writing, although in very informal contexts, simpler alternatives like "but not completely" or "with some limits" might be preferred.