with limitations

USAGE SUMMARY

"with limitations" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when talking about restrictions or boundaries that are placed upon something. For example: "She was granted the ability to work from home, but with limitations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A life with limitations because of limited funds and less than ultimate circumstances.

Huffington Post

The community approach comes with limitations, however.

The New York Times

Yet it was an achievement with limitations.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The Palestinians know they will be a country with limitations.

The Guardian

And they put up with limitations on free expression.

The Economist

Of those surveyed for the report, 70.7percentt were deemed employable with limitations.

The New York Times

How dare you decide that certain people with limitations are nonpersons with no right to exist?

The New York Times

"Rather than giving weight to the scientific data they opted to open a season with limitations.

The Guardian

He also cautioned that peace in Northern Ireland came with limitations.

The New York Times

But Mr. McCain's heavy reliance on the party comes with limitations.

The New York Times

People with limitations are making everything out of what they have.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with limitations", be specific about what those limitations are. This adds clarity and prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "with limitations" without explaining what those limitations entail. Vague statements can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with limitations" functions as an adverbial modifier, indicating a condition or restriction applied to a statement, action, or object. Ludwig provides numerous examples across diverse contexts illustrating this function.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with limitations" functions as an adverbial modifier to qualify statements, actions, or objects. It's grammatically correct and very commonly used in diverse contexts, ranging from news and media to scientific research. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase adds nuance and acknowledges imperfections or restrictions. To ensure clarity in writing, it's best practice to specify what the limitations are when using the phrase. Related alternatives include phrases like "with restrictions" and "subject to certain conditions".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with restrictions

Replaces "limitations" with a direct synonym, emphasizing the presence of specific rules or conditions.

with constraints

Focuses on restrictions imposed by external factors, often resource-related.

subject to certain conditions

Highlights that the applicability or validity depends on meeting specific requirements.

within certain parameters

Emphasizes operating within defined boundaries or ranges.

to a limited extent

Indicates a partial or reduced degree of effectiveness or validity.

with certain caveats

Highlights the presence of warnings or conditions that qualify a statement.

having certain weaknesses

Directly points out deficiencies or areas of vulnerability.

imperfect

A single-word descriptor emphasizing the lack of flawlessness.

not without drawbacks

Acknowledges disadvantages or negative aspects alongside positive ones.

with strings attached

Suggests that apparent benefits are contingent upon accepting unfavorable conditions.

FAQs

How can I use "with limitations" in a sentence?

You can use "with limitations" to indicate that something is not perfect or has restrictions, such as "The study's findings are useful, but "with limitations".".

What phrases are similar to "with limitations"?

Alternatives include "with restrictions", "with constraints", or "subject to certain conditions".

Is it better to say "with limitations" or "with no limitations"?

The choice depends on the context. "With limitations" acknowledges imperfections, while "with no limitations" suggests something is unrestricted. Ensure your choice accurately reflects the situation.

What does "with limitations" imply in a scientific study?

In scientific contexts, "with limitations" often indicates that the study's scope or methodology had constraints that might affect the generalizability or certainty of the results. Researchers often discuss these "with restrictions" in the study's discussion section.