with duties

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with duties" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe responsibilities or tasks associated with a particular role or position. Example: "The job description includes various responsibilities, with duties ranging from customer service to administrative tasks."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Then, with duties calling, the gatherings dispersed.

The New York Times

And those with duties to shareholders are no less compromised.

The Guardian

In 2003 America's Department of Commerce hit imports of the fish with duties of 37-64%.

The Economist

But his budget ignored the tax base, tinkering only with duties on wine and other trifles.

The Economist

In China imported art is often levied with duties that can reach 35 percent of an object's value.

The New York Times - Arts

On agricultural goods, more than half would become duty-free, with duties ending for the remaining goods over 15 years.

The New York Times

There was a clear chain of command and a firmly established hierarchy of officials, with duties clearly apportioned between authorities.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Every U.S. state has an elected attorney general with duties similar to those of the federal attorney general.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The training for officers in the unit is already extensive, with duties ranging from hostage negotiation to biohazard detection.

The New York Times

Jared Belsky, executive vice president, with duties that included overseeing the agency's Atlanta office, was promoted to succeed Ms. Hofstetter as president for 360i United States.

The New York Times

From 1967 to 1976 Mr. Kubert was DC's director of publications, with duties that included overseeing the company's line of war comics.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a role or position, use "with duties" to clearly outline the responsibilities and tasks involved. Be specific about the nature of these duties to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid listing an excessive number of unrelated duties when using "with duties". Focus on the core responsibilities to maintain clarity and avoid overwhelming the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with duties" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun or pronoun. It specifies the responsibilities or obligations associated with something. Ludwig confirms this through numerous examples where the phrase delineates the scope of roles, positions, or assignments.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

20%

Encyclopedias

9%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

6%

Science & Research

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with duties" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe the responsibilities associated with a particular role, task, or position. Ludwig’s analysis shows that it is most frequently used in news and media, scientific, and encyclopedic contexts, indicating its versatility and broad applicability. When using "with duties", it's essential to be clear and specific about the responsibilities being described to avoid ambiguity. While phrases like "responsible for", "in charge of", and ""tasked with"" can serve as alternatives, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with responsibilities

This option is a more direct synonym, replacing the general term "duties" with the more specific "responsibilities", highlighting accountability.

responsible for

This phrase directly indicates accountability for specific tasks or outcomes, highlighting the obligation to ensure proper completion.

with obligations

This phrase emphasizes the binding nature of the tasks, highlighting the moral or legal requirement to fulfill them.

in charge of

This alternative focuses on the aspect of being responsible for something, emphasizing control and oversight.

tasked with

This option emphasizes the act of being assigned a specific task or duty, suggesting a formal delegation of responsibility.

with tasks

This alternative is a more specific substitution, focusing on the individual tasks that make up the broader set of duties.

entrusted with

This alternative conveys a sense of trust and confidence in someone's ability to handle responsibilities, implying a higher level of importance or sensitivity.

assigned to

This phrase simply indicates the allocation of duties to someone, without necessarily implying importance or complexity.

in connection with

This suggests a relationship or association with certain duties rather than directly holding them.

concerned with

This option indicates involvement or engagement with certain duties, implying a focus of attention or effort.

FAQs

How can I use "with duties" in a sentence?

You can use "with duties" to describe the responsibilities associated with a job, role, or position. For example, "The assistant store manager is "tasked with" hiring, training, and supervising a team of associates, with duties that include managing daily activity on the sales floor."

What are some alternatives to "with duties"?

Alternatives to "with duties" include phrases such as "responsible for", "in charge of", ""tasked with"", or "with responsibilities", depending on the specific context.

Is there a difference between "with duties" and "with responsibilities"?

While similar, "duties" often refers to specific tasks, while "responsibilities" can encompass broader accountabilities. Using "with responsibilities" implies a greater level of ownership and oversight compared to "with duties".

When is it appropriate to use "with duties" in formal writing?

"With duties" is appropriate in formal writing when clearly defining the tasks and obligations associated with a particular role or position. Ensure the duties are well-defined and relevant to the overall context.