in charge of

USAGE SUMMARY

"in charge of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use the phrase when referring to someone who is responsible for the management or oversight of something, such as a business, project, or team. For example, "John is in charge of the marketing team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Ospreys in charge of premises.

The New Yorker

"You're in charge of everything.

The New York Times

I'm in charge of that".

The New Yorker

Morgan was put in charge of Cienfuegos.

The New Yorker

The one in charge of presents.

The New Yorker

"I am not in charge of tickets.

The New York Times

They are in charge of this".

The New York Times

"I'm in charge of the fiction.

Independent

They are in charge of it now.

Independent

Who was in charge of that campaign?

The New Yorker

"Comrade Kaganovich is in charge of transport.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "in charge of" when you want to clearly indicate who has the authority and responsibility for a specific task, project, or area. For example: "She is "in charge of" the entire marketing campaign."

Common error

Avoid using "in charge of" interchangeably with phrases like "responsible for" without considering the context. "In charge of" implies authority, while "responsible for" simply implies accountability. For instance, someone can be responsible for a task without being "in charge of" the team performing it.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in charge of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating the person who has authority or responsibility. It's commonly used to specify roles and duties, as illustrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Encyclopedias

7%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Science

6%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in charge of" is a very common and grammatically correct way to indicate responsibility or authority. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used across various contexts, particularly in news and media. While synonyms like "responsible for" and "overseeing" exist, it's essential to consider the specific nuance you want to convey. Remember that "in charge of" emphasizes authority, while "responsible for" focuses on accountability. Using this knowledge effectively can improve the precision and clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

responsible for

Focuses on accountability and duties.

in control of

Highlights the aspect of maintaining power and order.

overseeing

Emphasizes a supervisory role.

managing

Highlights the act of directing and controlling resources.

supervising

Implies direct oversight and guidance.

heading

Suggests leadership and direction.

directing

Emphasizes providing guidance and instruction.

at the helm of

Implies steering or guiding something, often a project or organization.

administering

Focuses on the practical execution and management of tasks.

governing

Suggests ruling and making important decisions.

FAQs

How do I use "in charge of" in a sentence?

Use "in charge of" to indicate responsibility or authority over something. For example, "The manager is "in charge of" the entire department" or "Who is "in charge of" this project"?

What are some synonyms for "in charge of"?

Alternatives include "responsible for", "overseeing", "managing", or "supervising", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "in charge for" instead of "in charge of"?

No, the correct preposition to use with "in charge" is "of". "In charge for" is grammatically incorrect. Always use "in charge of".

What is the difference between "in charge of" and "responsible for"?

"In charge of" typically implies authority and control, while "responsible for" focuses more on accountability. You can be responsible for something without necessarily being "in charge of" it.