with responsibilities

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'with responsibilities' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the tasks and duties that someone is required to perform. For example: At his new job, John was given a position of authority with many responsibilities.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

As a parent, encourage responsible cellphone use by linking digital privileges with responsibilities.

Huffington Post

But rights come with responsibilities.

The New Yorker

Second, we would match rights with responsibilities.

The Guardian

But holidaying in Cambodia comes with responsibilities.

The Guardian - Travel

I started with responsibilities on Day 1.

The New York Times

He was a man with responsibilities.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

As with every privilege, this one comes bedecked with responsibilities.

The New Yorker

We also have lives, with responsibilities and Stuff To Do.

The Guardian - Books

Their awareness of being Jewish comes, however, with responsibilities.

The Guardian - Opinion

Importantly, people understood that rights come with responsibilities.

The Guardian - Opinion

And so Afropolitanism, young and cool, comes with responsibilities.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase "with responsibilities" to frame rights and privileges. For example, "Freedom of speech comes "with responsibilities", requiring individuals to use their voice ethically and respectfully."

Common error

Avoid framing sentences passively when using "with responsibilities". Instead of saying "Responsibilities were assigned to him", opt for "He was entrusted "with responsibilities"". This active voice emphasizes agency and clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with responsibilities" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, often modifying a noun or verb to specify the duties or obligations associated with a role, position, or action. Ludwig highlights its frequent and grammatically sound usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Formal & Business

25%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Science

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "with responsibilities" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to describe the duties, tasks, or obligations that accompany a particular role, privilege, or situation. Ludwig AI confirms its broad applicability across various domains. It is most commonly found in news media and business contexts, maintaining a neutral to professional tone. When using this phrase, ensure active voice to emphasize clarity and avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives like "responsible for" or "tasked with" to add nuance to your writing. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "with responsibilities" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

responsible for

This alternative is a very common and direct substitute.

with duties

This alternative simplifies the phrase by using the direct noun form.

entailing duties

This alternative focuses on the duties that come along with something.

carrying obligations

This alternative emphasizes the binding nature of obligations.

in charge of duties

This alternative highlights the role of being in charge.

tasked with accountabilities

This alternative focuses on the accountability aspect.

burdened with obligations

This alternative underscores the weight of obligations.

holding accountabilities

This alternative highlights the act of holding responsibility.

involving duties

This alternative simply states the involvement of duties.

accountable for

This alternative emphasizes being responsible for specific outcomes.

FAQs

How can I use "with responsibilities" in a sentence?

You can use "with responsibilities" to describe roles, duties, or privileges. For instance, "The new role comes "with responsibilities" for overseeing the entire department" or "Having a pet comes "with responsibilities", such as feeding and caring for the animal".

What are some alternatives to "with responsibilities"?

Alternatives include "responsible for", "tasked with", or "in charge of", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "with responsibility" or "with responsibilities"?

"With responsibility" refers to a general state of being accountable, while "with responsibilities" refers to specific tasks and duties. For example, someone might act "with responsibility" but be entrusted "with responsibilities" at work.

How does the phrase "with responsibilities" relate to the concept of rights?

The phrase "with responsibilities" is often used to emphasize that rights are accompanied by corresponding duties. For example, "Freedom of speech comes "with responsibilities", including avoiding defamation and incitement to violence".