wildly inaccurate

USAGE SUMMARY

'wildly inaccurate' is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is very inaccurate. For example, "His estimation of the cost was wildly inaccurate."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It's also wildly inaccurate.

The Washington Post

Yet predictions can be wildly inaccurate.

The Economist

Other times they are wildly inaccurate".

The New York Times - Books

Most of them were wildly inaccurate.

Harvard Business Review

Feith, reached on the phone, called Sands's book "wildly inaccurate".

The New Yorker

"My 18-year-old thought it was wildly inaccurate".

The New York Times

Mrs. Clinton herself called the attribution "wildly inaccurate".

The New York Times

But he said that early news reports were "wildly inaccurate".

The New York Times

None of the charts in this article are wildly inaccurate.

The Guardian

The result was that their aim became wildly inaccurate.

The Guardian - Film

This is where the film becomes wildly inaccurate.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "wildly inaccurate" be mindful of the tone, as it can sound critical. Consider the context and audience to determine if a more diplomatic phrase is appropriate.

Common error

While "wildly inaccurate" is widely understood, it might be perceived as informal or hyperbolic in certain professional or academic settings. Opt for alternatives like "significantly flawed" or "substantially incorrect" to maintain a more objective tone.

Linguistic Context

Wildly functions as an adverb modifying the adjective inaccurate, intensifying its meaning. Ludwig AI confirms that "wildly inaccurate" is grammatically correct and used to describe something significantly incorrect. Examples show its use across diverse contexts to emphasize the scale of inaccuracy.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Wiki

12%

Science

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

HuffPost

6%

The Guardian

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "wildly inaccurate" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase used to describe something that deviates significantly from accuracy. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and usability across various contexts. While primarily found in News & Media, it also appears in Science, Wiki, and Formal & Business settings. When choosing to use "wildly inaccurate," consider the audience and context, as a more precise term might be preferable in formal or academic writing. Alternatives such as "grossly incorrect" or "completely wrong" offer similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

grossly incorrect

Emphasizes the significant deviation from the truth.

completely wrong

Highlights the total lack of correctness.

way off the mark

An idiomatic expression suggesting a large error.

utterly false

Indicates a complete absence of truth.

substantially flawed

Focuses on the deep imperfections that lead to inaccuracy.

seriously mistaken

Highlights the grave nature of the error.

far from accurate

Indicates a significant distance from being correct.

highly imprecise

Emphasizes the lack of exactness.

distinctly erroneous

Stresses the presence of error.

patently untrue

Indicates the obvious nature of the falsehood.

FAQs

How can I use "wildly inaccurate" in a sentence?

You can use "wildly inaccurate" to describe something that is significantly incorrect or deviates substantially from the truth. For example: "The weather forecast was "wildly inaccurate" this week."

What are some alternatives to "wildly inaccurate"?

Some alternatives include "grossly incorrect", "completely wrong", or "way off the mark", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "wildly inaccurate" suitable for formal writing?

While "wildly inaccurate" is acceptable, it may be perceived as informal in some formal contexts. Consider using alternatives such as "significantly flawed" or "substantially incorrect" for a more professional tone.

What makes something "wildly inaccurate"?

Something is "wildly inaccurate" when it contains errors to a very large degree. It suggests that the information is not just slightly off, but significantly and demonstrably wrong.