Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

who was present

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "who was present" is correct and usable in written English.
For example, you could use this phrase in a sentence such as: "I would like to thank everyone who was present at the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Everyone demanded to know who was present.

News & Media

The New York Times

Who was present, and what was going on?

AMEN: And who was present on this occasion?

"He was frozen," said a granddaughter who was present.

One parent, who was present, described the situation as pandemonium.

News & Media

The New York Times

"It was beyond his realm," said someone who was present.

News & Media

The New York Times

He complained to a friend who was present….

News & Media

The New Yorker

If it did, Victor, who was present, never noticed.

Ernst was one of the 'boys' who was present when Hermann Goering was interrogated.

COL.AMEN: To the best of your knowledge and recollection, who was present?

COL.AMEN: I don't think you have yet told us just who was present at this conference.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When clarity is paramount, use "who was present" to explicitly denote physical presence or participation in an event or situation, avoiding ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "who was present" automatically implies influence or decision-making power. Clearly specify their role if they had an impact beyond mere attendance.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "who was present" functions as a relative clause, modifying a noun or pronoun to provide more information about the individuals present at a specific event or situation. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

20%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "who was present" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that functions as a relative clause, predominantly found in News & Media and Academic contexts. It serves to specify individuals present at an event. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered correct and usable. Alternatives include "who attended" and "who were there". When using the phrase, ensure it accurately reflects physical presence without implying unwarranted influence. Remember clarity is king!

FAQs

How can I use "who was present" in a sentence?

You can use "who was present" to identify individuals at an event, such as "The report detailed everyone "who was present" at the meeting".

What is a more formal alternative to "who was present"?

A more formal alternative is "who was in attendance", which is suitable for official reports or formal communications.

How does "who was present" differ from "who participated"?

"Who was present" simply indicates physical presence, while "who participated" suggests active involvement or contribution.

Is it correct to use "that was present" instead of "who was present"?

While "who" refers to people, "that" generally refers to things. Therefore, "who was present" is correct when referring to people, whereas "that was present" would be used for objects or non-human entities.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: