Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
who was present
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "who was present" is correct and usable in written English.
For example, you could use this phrase in a sentence such as: "I would like to thank everyone who was present at the meeting."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(16)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Everyone demanded to know who was present.
News & Media
Who was present, and what was going on?
Academia
AMEN: And who was present on this occasion?
Academia
"He was frozen," said a granddaughter who was present.
News & Media
One parent, who was present, described the situation as pandemonium.
News & Media
"It was beyond his realm," said someone who was present.
News & Media
He complained to a friend who was present….
News & Media
If it did, Victor, who was present, never noticed.
News & Media
Ernst was one of the 'boys' who was present when Hermann Goering was interrogated.
COL.AMEN: To the best of your knowledge and recollection, who was present?
Academia
COL.AMEN: I don't think you have yet told us just who was present at this conference.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When clarity is paramount, use "who was present" to explicitly denote physical presence or participation in an event or situation, avoiding ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid assuming that "who was present" automatically implies influence or decision-making power. Clearly specify their role if they had an impact beyond mere attendance.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "who was present" functions as a relative clause, modifying a noun or pronoun to provide more information about the individuals present at a specific event or situation. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
68%
Academia
20%
Science
12%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "who was present" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that functions as a relative clause, predominantly found in News & Media and Academic contexts. It serves to specify individuals present at an event. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered correct and usable. Alternatives include "who attended" and "who were there". When using the phrase, ensure it accurately reflects physical presence without implying unwarranted influence. Remember clarity is king!
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
who attended
Replaces "was present" with a more concise verb indicating attendance.
who were there
Uses a simpler construction to convey physical presence at a location or event.
who participated
Emphasizes active involvement rather than mere presence.
who took part
Similar to "who participated", highlighting contribution or engagement.
who was in attendance
Formal alternative using the noun "attendance" to express presence.
who was on hand
Suggests readiness or availability at the event.
who comprised the audience
Specifically refers to those who were part of an audience.
which individuals were there
More specific and formal way to ask about the people that attended.
the attendees
Uses a noun to refer to people present at something.
the people in attendance
Formal way to describe the participants.
FAQs
How can I use "who was present" in a sentence?
You can use "who was present" to identify individuals at an event, such as "The report detailed everyone "who was present" at the meeting".
What is a more formal alternative to "who was present"?
A more formal alternative is "who was in attendance", which is suitable for official reports or formal communications.
How does "who was present" differ from "who participated"?
"Who was present" simply indicates physical presence, while "who participated" suggests active involvement or contribution.
Is it correct to use "that was present" instead of "who was present"?
While "who" refers to people, "that" generally refers to things. Therefore, "who was present" is correct when referring to people, whereas "that was present" would be used for objects or non-human entities.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested