Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

who contributed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "who contributed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to individuals or groups that have made a contribution to a project, idea, or cause. Example: "The report highlights the key individuals who contributed to the success of the initiative."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Thanks to all those who contributed.

News & Media

The Guardian

Thank you to everyone who contributed.

News & Media

The Guardian

A huge thanks to everyone who contributed.

Thank you to all who contributed to this year's conference.

"We are very grateful to everyone who contributed on Kickstarter!

The response was overwhelming – thank you to everyone who contributed.

News & Media

The Guardian

Thank you so much to everyone who contributed.

The top financier donor was David Rowland, who contributed £1.1m.

News & Media

The Guardian

Also mentions Moscow businessmen who contributed to the defense fund.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

So just who contributes money to Mr. Gulotta?

News & Media

The New York Times

So thank everyone who contributes and do so quickly.

News & Media

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When acknowledging contributions, be specific about the nature of each person's contribution to provide meaningful recognition.

Common error

Avoid using "who contributed" as a generic placeholder. Instead of a vague statement like "Thanks to everyone who contributed", detail specific contributions like "Thanks to John for his statistical analysis and to Mary for her literature review."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "who contributed" functions as a relative clause, specifically a subject relative clause. It modifies a preceding noun phrase (e.g., people, individuals, researchers) by providing more information about those entities and specifying their action of contributing. As Ludwig AI highlights, this phrase is widely used and grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Academia

28%

Science

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "who contributed" is a grammatically sound and widely used relative clause that serves to acknowledge individuals or groups that have provided assistance or input. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. It is most frequently found in news media, academia, and scientific contexts, indicating a neutral to professional register. When using the phrase, be specific about the nature of each person's contribution to provide meaningful recognition. While highly versatile, it's important to be mindful of the context and consider more formal alternatives when appropriate, ensuring that acknowledgments are not vague but rather highlight the precise contributions made.

FAQs

How can I use "who contributed" in a sentence?

You can use "who contributed" to introduce a relative clause that identifies individuals or groups that provided assistance or input, such as, "The researchers thanked the patients "who contributed" samples to the study".

What is a more formal alternative to "who contributed"?

In more formal contexts, consider using phrases like "those "who played a part"", "individuals "who were instrumental"", or "parties "that donated"" depending on the specific type of contribution.

Is it correct to say "who contributed to" or "that contributed to"?

Both "who contributed to" and "that contributed to" are grammatically correct, but "who" is generally preferred when referring to people, while "that" is more commonly used for things or groups. Therefore, when talking about people, "who contributed to" is the better choice.

What's the difference between "who contributed" and "who participated"?

"Who contributed" implies making a specific offering or input, while "who participated" simply means taking part in something. Contributing suggests a more active or significant role than simply participating.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: