Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
who contributed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "who contributed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to individuals or groups that have made a contribution to a project, idea, or cause. Example: "The report highlights the key individuals who contributed to the success of the initiative."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
Thanks to all those who contributed.
News & Media
Thank you to everyone who contributed.
News & Media
A huge thanks to everyone who contributed.
News & Media
Thank you to all who contributed to this year's conference.
"We are very grateful to everyone who contributed on Kickstarter!
Academia
The response was overwhelming – thank you to everyone who contributed.
News & Media
Thank you so much to everyone who contributed.
News & Media
The top financier donor was David Rowland, who contributed £1.1m.
News & Media
Also mentions Moscow businessmen who contributed to the defense fund.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
2 human-written examples
So just who contributes money to Mr. Gulotta?
News & Media
So thank everyone who contributes and do so quickly.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When acknowledging contributions, be specific about the nature of each person's contribution to provide meaningful recognition.
Common error
Avoid using "who contributed" as a generic placeholder. Instead of a vague statement like "Thanks to everyone who contributed", detail specific contributions like "Thanks to John for his statistical analysis and to Mary for her literature review."
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "who contributed" functions as a relative clause, specifically a subject relative clause. It modifies a preceding noun phrase (e.g., people, individuals, researchers) by providing more information about those entities and specifying their action of contributing. As Ludwig AI highlights, this phrase is widely used and grammatically sound.
Frequent in
News & Media
44%
Academia
28%
Science
22%
Less common in
Formal & Business
6%
Reference
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "who contributed" is a grammatically sound and widely used relative clause that serves to acknowledge individuals or groups that have provided assistance or input. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. It is most frequently found in news media, academia, and scientific contexts, indicating a neutral to professional register. When using the phrase, be specific about the nature of each person's contribution to provide meaningful recognition. While highly versatile, it's important to be mindful of the context and consider more formal alternatives when appropriate, ensuring that acknowledgments are not vague but rather highlight the precise contributions made.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
those who helped
Replaces "contributed" with a simpler synonym, focusing on assistance.
people that assisted
Similar to 'those who helped' but uses 'assisted' instead of 'helped'.
individuals involved
Focuses on the involvement of people, replacing "contributed" with a broader term.
members who supported
Highlights the support provided by members of a group.
participants who aided
Replaces "contributed" with "aided" and uses "participants" to emphasize involvement.
those that played a role
Focuses on the part someone played, rather than the specific act of contributing.
persons who lent support
Emphasizes the act of support, a specific type of contribution.
the ones that gave
Uses 'gave' as a general term for contribution.
those instrumental in
Highlights those who were key or essential.
parties that donated
Implies a financial or material contribution, a more specific type of involvement.
FAQs
How can I use "who contributed" in a sentence?
You can use "who contributed" to introduce a relative clause that identifies individuals or groups that provided assistance or input, such as, "The researchers thanked the patients "who contributed" samples to the study".
What is a more formal alternative to "who contributed"?
In more formal contexts, consider using phrases like "those "who played a part"", "individuals "who were instrumental"", or "parties "that donated"" depending on the specific type of contribution.
Is it correct to say "who contributed to" or "that contributed to"?
Both "who contributed to" and "that contributed to" are grammatically correct, but "who" is generally preferred when referring to people, while "that" is more commonly used for things or groups. Therefore, when talking about people, "who contributed to" is the better choice.
What's the difference between "who contributed" and "who participated"?
"Who contributed" implies making a specific offering or input, while "who participated" simply means taking part in something. Contributing suggests a more active or significant role than simply participating.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested