Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
which involved
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'which involved' is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to something that was involved in a previous statement. For example: "I attempted a difficult task, which involved a lot of risk-taking."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
Earlier attempts, one of which involved hot pants, fell flat.
News & Media
Early reviews (which involved tests on lightly soiled hardwood, linoleum, various carpets) have been favorable.
News & Media
Kaliprassana Sinha wrote satirical sketches of colonial Calcutta, many of which involved religion.
News & Media
Ahmed claims that she heard of six enquiries into sexual harassment, four of which involved teachers.
News & Media
Tells about the early episodes which involved housing in Queens.
News & Media
The business, which involved hard liquor only, was deadly dull.
News & Media
He was working vigilancia, he said, which involved patrolling.
News & Media
survey, which involved 90,000 patients in 81 countries.
News & Media
The attack, which involved a suicide bomber, was repelled.
News & Media
Ahmed led the conversation, which involved goats and water projects.
News & Media
Seven people died in the crash, which involved 34 vehicles.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "which involved", ensure the clause it introduces is nonrestrictive, meaning it adds extra information but isn't essential to the sentence's core meaning. Use commas to set off the "which involved" clause.
Common error
Avoid using "that involved" in nonrestrictive clauses. "That" is for restrictive clauses, which are essential to the sentence's meaning. Use "which involved" for nonrestrictive clauses, which add extra, non-essential information and are set off by commas.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "which involved" functions as a relative clause introducing additional information about a previously mentioned noun or event. It provides details about what was included or participated in a particular situation. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is a correct and usable part of English.
Frequent in
News & Media
69%
Science
22%
Formal & Business
3%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "which involved" is a frequently used and grammatically sound phrase that introduces nonrestrictive clauses. It adds extra detail to a preceding noun or event. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable. It's common in news, media, and scientific contexts. Remember to use commas to set off the "which involved" clause and to differentiate it from restrictive clauses that use "that". Using alternatives like "that included" or "that comprised" can add variety to your writing. The phrase functions to provide detail and context, maintaining a neutral tone appropriate for both formal and informal writing. It is definitely a phrase to have in your writing toolkit.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
that included
Focuses on the inclusion aspect, emphasizing the elements contained within something.
that encompassed
Implies a broader scope, suggesting the subject covered a wide range of elements.
that comprised
Highlights the components that made up the subject, focusing on composition.
that consisted of
Similar to 'comprised', emphasizing the constituent parts of the subject.
that entailed
Highlights the consequences or necessary conditions associated with the subject.
that necessitated
Emphasizes the required elements or actions that were essential for the subject.
that required
Similar to 'necessitated', focusing on the prerequisites or needs of the subject.
that concerned
Indicates the topic or subject matter that the subject related to.
that pertained to
Suggests a direct relevance or connection to a particular topic.
that featured
Highlights specific aspects or elements that were prominent or notable within the subject.
FAQs
How do I use "which involved" in a sentence?
Use "which involved" to introduce a nonrestrictive clause that provides additional information about a noun or situation already mentioned. For example, "The project, "which involved" extensive research, was a success."
What are some alternatives to "which involved"?
You can use alternatives such as "that included", "that comprised", or "that entailed", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to use "that involved" instead of "which involved"?
In nonrestrictive clauses, it's more appropriate to use "which involved". "That involved" is generally used for restrictive clauses, which are essential to the meaning of the sentence. The clause introduced by "which involved" is set off by commas.
What's the difference between "which involved" and "which included"?
"Which involved" implies a more general connection or participation, while "which included" specifically indicates that certain elements were part of something. The choice depends on whether you want to highlight the participation or the inclusion of specific components.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested