were submitted to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were submitted to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was presented or handed over to someone or something for consideration, review, or approval. Example: "The documents were submitted to the committee for evaluation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The events featured here were submitted to our open noticeboard.

The Guardian

They were submitted to some fairly brutal ostracism.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Eluates were submitted to the Proteomic Facility at NYU.

Nature

LDTgChAT-hM3 mice were submitted to SubSD as described above.

Nature

The data were submitted to principal component analysis.

Geoderma

Control mice (Sham) were submitted to skin incision only.

Morphologie

HIV-1 positive samples were submitted to viral load quantification.

Journal of Clinical Virology

The coatings were submitted to the electron emission investigations.

Surface and Coatings Technology

These motions were submitted to the court upon affidavits.

Cornell University

Four "exceptional individuals" were submitted to Christ, who chose Blackwell.

University of California, Berkeley

Products were submitted to facilitate a review.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were submitted to" when you want to emphasize the formal act of presenting something for review, approval, or consideration. This phrase is suitable for academic papers, legal documents, and official reports.

Common error

Avoid using "were submitted by" when you mean "were submitted to". The former indicates who did the submitting, while the latter indicates to whom or what the submission was made.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were submitted to" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something was presented or handed over to someone or something else. According to Ludwig, this phrase is commonly used and grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

12%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were submitted to" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for indicating that something was formally presented for consideration or review. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it conveys a neutral to formal tone, suitable for official reports and documented settings. Alternatives such as "were presented to" or "were handed over to" offer subtle nuances in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were presented to

This alternative focuses on the act of showing or offering something formally, emphasizing the presentation aspect rather than the act of handing something in.

were handed over to

This alternative highlights the physical act of transferring something, suggesting a more direct and personal delivery.

were given to

This alternative is a more general term for transferring possession or control, lacking the formal connotation of "submitted".

were referred to

This alternative emphasizes directing something to a specific entity, often for evaluation or action, and implies a degree of recommendation.

were forwarded to

This suggests a relaying or passing on of information or items, often indicating a step in a process.

were directed to

This emphasizes the routing or channeling of something towards a particular recipient or purpose.

were sent to

A general term indicating something was dispatched or transmitted, without necessarily implying formal submission.

were turned in to

This alternative implies a formal process of delivering something, often associated with assignments or official documents.

were provided to

This highlights the act of supplying or making something available, focusing on the provision aspect.

were consigned to

This suggests entrusting something to someone's care or control, often implying a formal agreement or responsibility.

FAQs

How can I use "were submitted to" in a sentence?

Use "were submitted to" to indicate that something was formally presented or handed over for consideration, review, or approval. For example, "The research findings "were submitted to" the journal for publication".

What are some alternatives to "were submitted to"?

Alternatives include "were presented to", "were handed over to", or "were referred to", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "were submitted by" instead of "were submitted to"?

No, "were submitted by" and "were submitted to" have different meanings. "Were submitted by" indicates who did the submitting, while "were submitted to" indicates to whom or what the submission was made. For example, "The report "were submitted by" the team" versus "The report "were submitted to" the committee".

What is the difference between "were submitted to" and "were sent to"?

"Were submitted to" implies a formal process of presenting something for consideration, review, or approval. "Were sent to", on the other hand, simply means that something was dispatched or transmitted, without necessarily implying a formal submission. For example: "The application "were submitted to" the admissions office." vs. "The package "were sent to" the customer."