Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were selected with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were selected with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process or criteria by which certain items or individuals were chosen or picked. Example: "The candidates were selected with careful consideration of their qualifications and experience."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Clones containing pBS12086 were selected with thiostrepton.
Science & Research
Transfected cells were selected with puromycin for 4 days.
Science & Research
Dunleavy and Wagner were selected with their fathers, Mike Dunleavy and Milt Wagner, in attendance.
News & Media
The transduced cells were selected with puromycine (2 ug/mL) for 48 hours.
Science & Research
Cells were selected with 2 μg/ml puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 days.
Science & Research
Stably transfected cells were selected with 1 μg/ml of puromycin 96 hours after transduction.
Science & Research
The transfected cells were selected with antibiotics for 2 weeks to generate the stable cell lines.
Science & Research
Bombarded banana cells were selected with hygromycin and regenerated into plants.
Science & Research
After replating, the electroporated cells were selected with 500 ng mL−1 puromycin.
Science & Research
Stably expressing cells were selected with 1 mg ml−1 G418 antibiotic.
Science & Research
Particles were selected with "Analyze particles" tool.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were selected with", ensure the subject and object of the sentence are logically connected. The thing or person being selected should align with what's being used in the selection.
Common error
Avoid using "were selected with" when describing inherent qualities or attributes. It's more appropriate for describing the process of selection, not the reason for selection. Instead of "The team members were selected with talent," consider "The team members were selected for their talent."
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were selected with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject (people, items, etc.) underwent a selection process, and it specifies the tool, method, or criterion used in that process. Ludwig AI examples showcase usage across different domains like science and news.
Frequent in
Science
66%
News & Media
15%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
4%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were selected with" is a versatile and grammatically correct construction used to describe a selection process, highlighting the methods or criteria employed. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage across diverse fields like science, news, and academia. To enhance clarity, ensure that the object following "with" accurately represents the selection method rather than inherent attributes. Alternatives such as "were chosen based on" or "were picked using" can provide nuanced options for expressing similar ideas. While frequently found in scientific and formal contexts, its neutral register makes it suitable for a wide range of writing styles.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were chosen with
Focuses on the act of choosing rather than a broader selection process.
were handpicked with
Emphasizes careful and individual selection.
were designated with
Suggests a formal appointment or assignment.
were favored with
Implies a preference or advantage in the selection process.
were equipped with
Indicates the provision of tools or resources during selection.
were identified with
Highlights recognition or association rather than a deliberate selection.
were entrusted with
Highlights assigning a responsibility or duty.
were obtained with
Focuses on acquisition of things more than selecting persons.
were blessed with
Implies a divine or fortunate selection.
were granted with
Indicates something has been bestowed or given.
FAQs
What does "were selected with" mean?
The phrase "were selected with" indicates that a particular method, tool, or criterion was used in the process of choosing or picking something or someone. For example, "The finalists "were selected with" a blind review process" means that the selection was based on a process where the reviewers didn't know the identities of the candidates.
How can I use "were selected with" in a sentence?
You can use "were selected with" to describe how a choice was made. For instance, "The winning design "were selected with" input from community members", showing community input was part of the selection process.
What are some alternatives to "were selected with"?
Alternatives include "were chosen based on", "were picked using", or "were identified through", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey. These alternatives offer similar meanings but emphasize different aspects of the selection process.
Is it correct to say "were selected with" or should I use another phrase?
The phrase "were selected with" is grammatically correct and commonly used, according to Ludwig AI. However, ensure the preposition "with" accurately reflects the method or tool used in the selection. If you're describing qualities that led to the selection, using "were selected for" may be more appropriate.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested