Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were scarce
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'were scarce' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to describe a situation in which there is not a large quantity of something available. For example, "Organic foods were scarce in the small town".
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
Gate-crashers were scarce.
News & Media
Transport helicopters were scarce.
News & Media
Highlights were scarce.
News & Media
Jeans were scarce.
News & Media
Buyers were scarce.
News & Media
Jobs were scarce.
News & Media
Decent dismounts were scarce.
News & Media
Consumer goods were scarce.
News & Media
People were scarce.
News & Media
Runs were scarce.
News & Media
Working phones were scarce.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were scarce", ensure the subject is plural to match the verb conjugation. For instance, "Opportunities were scarce" is grammatically correct.
Common error
Avoid using "was scarce" when referring to multiple items or a plural subject. The correct form is "were scarce" to maintain subject-verb agreement. For example, instead of writing "Opportunities was scarce", write "Opportunities were scarce".
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were scarce" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state or condition of the subject. As Ludwig AI indicates, it signifies that something is uncommon, rare, or insufficient to meet demand.
Frequent in
News & Media
95%
Encyclopedias
2%
Science
1%
Less common in
Formal & Business
1%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "were scarce" is a versatile phrase used to denote a limited quantity or availability of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is correct and frequently appears in various contexts, especially in news and media. This phrase functions as a predicate adjective and maintains a neutral register. To ensure grammatical correctness, use "were scarce" with plural subjects. By understanding its appropriate usage, writers can effectively convey scarcity in their writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were limited
Emphasizes a restriction on the quantity or extent of something.
were in short supply
Highlights the insufficient amount of something available.
were few and far between
Indicates that occurrences were infrequent and dispersed.
were uncommon
Suggests that something was not frequently encountered or seen.
were rare
Indicates a very low frequency or availability.
were deficient
Highlights a lack or inadequacy in quantity or quality.
were sparse
Suggests that something was thinly distributed or present.
were at a premium
Highlights the high value placed on something due to its limited availability.
were thin on the ground
Indicates that something was scarcely present or available in a particular area.
were hard to come by
Emphasizes the difficulty in obtaining or finding something.
FAQs
How can I use "were scarce" in a sentence?
You can use "were scarce" to describe situations where something is limited or not readily available, such as "Job opportunities "were scarce" during the recession".
What's the difference between "were scarce" and "were limited"?
"Were scarce" emphasizes a general lack or shortage, while "were limited" suggests a restriction or constraint on the quantity or extent of something. For example, "Resources "were scarce" due to the drought", versus "Access to the building "were limited" to authorized personnel".
What can I say instead of "were scarce"?
You can use alternatives like ""were limited"", "were uncommon", or "were in short supply" depending on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "was scarce" instead of "were scarce"?
No, "was scarce" should be used with singular subjects, while "were scarce" is used with plural subjects. For example, "Food was scarce" (singular) versus "Resources "were scarce"" (plural).
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested