Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were scarce

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'were scarce' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to describe a situation in which there is not a large quantity of something available. For example, "Organic foods were scarce in the small town".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Gate-crashers were scarce.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Transport helicopters were scarce.

News & Media

The New York Times

Highlights were scarce.

Jeans were scarce.

News & Media

The New York Times

Buyers were scarce.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Jobs were scarce.

News & Media

The New York Times

Decent dismounts were scarce.

Consumer goods were scarce.

People were scarce.

Runs were scarce.

Working phones were scarce.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were scarce", ensure the subject is plural to match the verb conjugation. For instance, "Opportunities were scarce" is grammatically correct.

Common error

Avoid using "was scarce" when referring to multiple items or a plural subject. The correct form is "were scarce" to maintain subject-verb agreement. For example, instead of writing "Opportunities was scarce", write "Opportunities were scarce".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were scarce" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state or condition of the subject. As Ludwig AI indicates, it signifies that something is uncommon, rare, or insufficient to meet demand.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

95%

Encyclopedias

2%

Science

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were scarce" is a versatile phrase used to denote a limited quantity or availability of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is correct and frequently appears in various contexts, especially in news and media. This phrase functions as a predicate adjective and maintains a neutral register. To ensure grammatical correctness, use "were scarce" with plural subjects. By understanding its appropriate usage, writers can effectively convey scarcity in their writing.

FAQs

How can I use "were scarce" in a sentence?

You can use "were scarce" to describe situations where something is limited or not readily available, such as "Job opportunities "were scarce" during the recession".

What's the difference between "were scarce" and "were limited"?

"Were scarce" emphasizes a general lack or shortage, while "were limited" suggests a restriction or constraint on the quantity or extent of something. For example, "Resources "were scarce" due to the drought", versus "Access to the building "were limited" to authorized personnel".

What can I say instead of "were scarce"?

You can use alternatives like ""were limited"", "were uncommon", or "were in short supply" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was scarce" instead of "were scarce"?

No, "was scarce" should be used with singular subjects, while "were scarce" is used with plural subjects. For example, "Food was scarce" (singular) versus "Resources "were scarce"" (plural).

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: