Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were limited
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'were limited' is correct and usable in written English.
For example, you could use it in the sentence, "We were limited in our choices due to the limited supplies."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
We were limited.
News & Media
Disappointments were limited.
News & Media
Escape routes were limited.
News & Media
Smith's options were limited.
News & Media
Life's options were limited.
News & Media
The results were limited.
News & Media
Japan's options were limited.
News & Media
American casualties were limited.
News & Media
The options were limited.
News & Media
The objectives were limited.
News & Media
Her options were limited.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were limited", ensure the context clearly indicates what was limited and by what means. For example, "Resources were limited due to budget cuts" provides a complete understanding.
Common error
Avoid using "were limited" without specifying what was limited or the cause of the limitation. A vague statement like "Opportunities were limited" lacks clarity. Instead, specify "Job opportunities were limited due to the economic downturn."
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were limited" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject experienced a restriction or constraint. Ludwig provides examples showing its use in contexts where options, resources, or opportunities were not freely available.
Frequent in
News & Media
46%
Science
25%
Encyclopedias
6%
Less common in
Formal & Business
6%
Wiki
6%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were limited" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating restriction or constraint. It is grammatically correct and very commonly used, as affirmed by Ludwig, across diverse contexts including news, science, and encyclopedias. The phrase conveys a lack of freedom or range, often explaining why certain outcomes were not possible. While versatile, clarity is key: specify what was limited and by what cause to avoid vagueness. Related phrases include "were restricted" and "were constrained". The phrase's neutral register and high frequency make it a valuable tool for effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were constrained
Emphasizes restriction or compulsion by external forces.
were restricted
Highlights the imposition of rules or boundaries.
were curtailed
Focuses on the reduction or cutting short of something.
were diminished
Indicates a reduction in size, extent, or importance.
were reduced
Highlights a decrease in quantity, size, or extent.
were scarce
Emphasizes the rarity or insufficient availability of something.
were few
Indicates a small number or quantity.
were in short supply
Focuses on the lack of sufficient quantity or availability.
were bounded
Implies a clear limit or boundary.
were checked
Highlights the action of controlling or restraining.
FAQs
How can I use "were limited" in a sentence?
The phrase "were limited" is used to indicate that something was restricted or constrained. For example, "Our resources "were limited" due to the budget cuts" or "The choices "were limited" by the availability of materials".
What can I say instead of "were limited"?
You can use alternatives such as "were restricted", "were constrained", or "were scarce" depending on the specific context.
Which is correct, "were limited" or "was limited"?
"Were limited" is used with plural subjects, while "was limited" is used with singular subjects. For example, "Opportunities were limited" (plural) versus "Opportunity was limited" (singular).
What is the difference between "were limited" and "had limits"?
"Were limited" describes a state of being restricted. "Had limits" emphasizes the existence of boundaries or constraints. For example, "Their options "were limited" due to the circumstances" versus "The project had limits on its scope".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested