Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were rejected

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were rejected" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was not accepted or approved in the past. Example: "The proposals submitted by the team were rejected due to budget constraints."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The offers were rejected.

Both offers were rejected.

Another 145 were rejected.

News & Media

The New York Times

Captions were rejected.

News & Media

The New York Times

They were rejected.

Three efforts were rejected.

News & Media

The New York Times

Other charges were rejected.

News & Media

The New York Times

They all were rejected.

These alternatives were rejected.

Those applications were rejected.

News & Media

The Guardian

The requests were rejected.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were rejected" when you want to clearly state that something was not accepted. Ensure the subject of the sentence clearly indicates what was rejected, and the context provides understanding of why. For example: "The proposed changes were rejected due to budget constraints."

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive voice constructions like "were rejected" when active voice would be more direct and engaging. Instead of "The application were rejected by the committee", consider "The committee rejected the application" for a stronger impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were rejected" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject received the action of being rejected. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were rejected" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase, effectively conveying the non-acceptance of a subject. As noted by Ludwig AI, this phrase is suitable for various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal settings. While highly versatile, consider active voice alternatives for a more direct writing style. Remember to use the correct verb conjugation ("was" vs. "were") based on the subject's singularity or plurality. With its frequent appearance in authoritative sources, mastering the use of "were rejected" enhances clarity and professionalism in writing.

FAQs

How do I use "were rejected" in a sentence?

Use "were rejected" to indicate that something was not accepted or approved. For example: "The initial proposals "were rejected" due to feasibility concerns."

What can I say instead of "were rejected"?

You can use alternatives such as "were declined", "were refused", or "were turned down" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "were rejected" or "was rejected"?

"Were rejected" is used for plural subjects, while "was rejected" is used for singular subjects. For example, "The applications were rejected" versus "The application was rejected".

What's the difference between "were rejected" and "were dismissed"?

"Were rejected" implies a formal refusal or non-acceptance, while "were dismissed" suggests something was considered unimportant or not worthy of consideration.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: