were not excluded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were not excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that certain individuals or items were included in a group or consideration, rather than being left out. Example: "All participants in the study were not excluded from the final analysis, ensuring comprehensive results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They were not excluded from the analyses.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Fifth, several rare causes of TCH were not excluded properly.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Patients were not excluded if they presented more than once.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Three people failed to specify gender but were not excluded.

Sports Medicine - Open

Controlled medical conditions and smoking status were not excluded.

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Nine people did not specify ethnicity but were not excluded.

Sports Medicine - Open

Patients with major psychiatric diseases or alcohol or substance use disorders were not excluded.

Duke University

Breastfeeding women were not excluded.

Plosone

The 'abnormal' seminiferous tubules were not excluded from these analyses.

Plosone

Teenagers were not excluded.

BMC Public Health

These participants were not excluded.

Aging

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were not excluded", ensure the context clearly specifies the criteria for potential exclusion to avoid ambiguity. For example, clarify what characteristics might have led to exclusion but did not.

Common error

Avoid using "were not excluded" without clearly defining the criteria for exclusion. Without specific criteria, the statement becomes meaningless and doesn't provide useful information about the selection process or the characteristics of the included subjects or items.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were not excluded" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that certain items or individuals were not subjected to the act of exclusion. As Ludwig AI suggests, this construction implies a deliberate decision or process where exclusion was a possibility, but it did not occur.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

Academia

30%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

News & Media

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were not excluded" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's used to indicate that certain elements were considered for exclusion but ultimately retained. To ensure clarity, it's best practice to specify the criteria that could have led to exclusion. While alternatives like "were included" exist, "were not excluded" is preferred when highlighting potential reasons for omission. Understanding its function and purpose allows for more precise and effective communication in various writing scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were not removed

Directly states the absence of removal, similar to the original phrase.

were not omitted

Highlights the absence of omission, emphasizing completeness.

remained included

Emphasizes the continued state of being included.

were kept in

Focuses on maintaining inclusion rather than avoiding exclusion.

were retained

Implies a deliberate decision to keep something or someone included.

were left in

Suggests a passive inclusion, where no action was taken to remove.

were encompassed

Implies a broad inclusion, covering a wide range of items or individuals.

were incorporated

Suggests a more active process of adding something into a whole.

were factored in

Suggests that something was included as a factor in a calculation or decision.

were considered

Indicates that something was taken into account, not necessarily excluded.

FAQs

How can I use "were not excluded" in a sentence?

You can use "were not excluded" to indicate that certain items or individuals met the inclusion criteria for a study or analysis, like: "Patients with pre-existing conditions "were not excluded" from the trial".

What's a good alternative to "were not excluded"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "were included", "were retained", or "were kept in" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it better to say "were included" or "were not excluded"?

Both phrases can be correct, but "were not excluded" is often used when there's a specific reason why some items or individuals might have been removed. "Were included" is a more general statement of inclusion.

What does it mean when a study says participants "were not excluded"?

It means that the participants met the study's criteria for inclusion and did not possess any characteristics that would have disqualified them, such as specific health conditions or age ranges. Researchers explicitly state this to ensure transparency.