Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were measured by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'were measured by' is correct and usable in written English.
For example, "The temperature and wind speed of the hurricane were measured by Specialized Weather Instruments."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Adenine nucleotides were measured by HPLC.
Academia
Vitamin D levels were measured by radioimmunoassay.
News & Media
AGEs were measured by ELISA.
Science
The relative enthusiasms were measured by social classification.
News & Media
LTB\ _4\) and LXA\ _4\) were measured by enzyme immunoassay.
Academia
Plasma sVEGFR1 and sVEGFR2 concentrations were measured by ELISA.
Science & Research
Abdominal fat areas were measured by computerized tomography (CT).
Science & Research
(B) Intracellular TG levels were measured by TG assay kit.
Science & Research
RNA concentration and quality were measured by a nanodrop spectrophotometer.
Science & Research
Levels of PD-L1 were measured by flow cytometry.
Science & Research
Protein concentrations were measured by the Bradford assay (BioRad).
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were measured by", ensure the subject being measured is clearly defined and that the method of measurement is appropriate for the context. This phrase is commonly used in scientific and technical writing to indicate a specific measurement technique or instrument.
Common error
A common mistake is not specifying the unit of measurement after stating something "were measured by". Always include the units (e.g., "were measured by HPLC in mg/L") to avoid ambiguity and ensure clarity.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were measured by" functions as a passive construction, indicating the method used to quantify or assess a particular variable. As Ludwig AI suggests, this construction is common in scientific literature, where the focus is often on the measurement technique rather than the entity performing the measurement.
Frequent in
Science
73%
Academia
18%
News & Media
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Encyclopedias
1%
Wiki
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were measured by" is a common and grammatically correct passive voice construction, as validated by Ludwig AI. It's predominantly used in formal and scientific contexts to describe the methods used for quantifying variables, as evidenced by its frequent appearance in scientific publications and academic research. To ensure clarity, it's crucial to specify the measurement units and avoid ambiguity. While alternatives exist, such as "were quantified via" or "were assessed through", "were measured by" remains a widely accepted and understood phrase for indicating the method of measurement.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were quantified via
Replaces "measured" with "quantified" and uses "via" instead of "by", focusing on the method used for measurement.
were assessed through
Substitutes "measured" with "assessed", emphasizing the evaluation aspect, and "through" for "by", highlighting the process.
were determined using
Uses "determined" instead of "measured", focusing on the establishment of a value, and "using" instead of "by".
measurement was performed by
Changes the sentence structure to active voice, emphasizing the act of measurement.
were evaluated by means of
Emphasizes the evaluation process using a more formal and detailed expression.
were gauged by
Replaces "measured" with "gauged", suggesting a more approximate or estimated measurement.
were estimated via
Focuses on estimation rather than precise measurement, using "via" to indicate the method.
were calculated based on
Highlights the calculation aspect, implying a mathematical process was involved in obtaining the value.
were detected with
Focuses on the detection of a phenomenon or substance, using "with" to specify the instrument or technique.
were monitored through
Emphasizes the continuous tracking of something over time, using "through" to indicate the method of monitoring.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "were measured by" to sound more active?
You can rephrase "were measured by" in the active voice, such as "researchers measured X using Y" or "Y was used to measure X". This can make your writing more direct and engaging.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when using "were measured by"?
Whether to use active or passive voice depends on the context. Passive voice (e.g., "concentrations "were measured by" HPLC") is suitable when the measurement method is more important than the actor. Active voice (e.g., "we measured concentrations using HPLC") emphasizes the actor and is often preferred for clarity and directness.
What are some common methods that things "were measured by"?
Common methods used after ""were measured by"" include HPLC (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography), ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay), mass spectrometry, spectrophotometry, and various imaging techniques like MRI or CT scans.
What are some alternatives to ""were measured by"" that still convey the same meaning?
Alternatives include "were quantified via", "were assessed through", "were determined using", or "measurement was performed by". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested