Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were joined by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were joined by" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate when two or more people or groups have come together or become associated. For example, "The two companies were joined by a mutual interest in sustainability."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
57 human-written examples
The men were joined by their wives.
News & Media
We were joined by the neighborhood cop.
News & Media
On Monday, they were joined by Greece.
News & Media
We were joined by Petty Officer Heath.
News & Media
(They were joined by Aaron Neveu on drums).
News & Media
They were joined by photographers Patrick Chauvel and Yuri Kozyrev.
News & Media
They were joined by 380 men.
News & Media
Eventually, they were joined by Johnson himself.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
3 human-written examples
Sean Lock and Jon Richardson are joined by Rhod Gilbert, Kevin Bridges and Josie Long.
News & Media
He is joined by a female colleague.
News & Media
They'll be joined by Pete Tong and Carl Kennedy.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were joined by", ensure that the entities being joined are clearly defined and that the context makes it clear what kind of association is being formed. For example, "The initial protesters were joined by students and faculty", which indicates a growing number of people participated in the protest.
Common error
Avoid using "were joined by" when an active voice is more appropriate. For instance, instead of "The meeting were joined by several new members", consider "Several new members joined the meeting" for a more direct and concise statement.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were joined by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject received an action, specifically the act of being joined by someone or something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this construction is grammatically sound and frequently used.
Frequent in
News & Media
61%
Science
22%
Academia
12%
Less common in
Wiki
2%
Formal & Business
1%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "were joined by" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that a subject was accompanied or augmented by others. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and broad applicability. The phrase appears most frequently in news and media, science, and academic contexts, demonstrating its versatility. When using "were joined by", ensure clarity in defining the entities being joined and consider whether an active voice might be more appropriate for a more direct statement. For semantically similar alternatives, you might consider phrases like "were accompanied by" or "were united with", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were accompanied by
Focuses on simultaneous presence or occurrence, suggesting a more general association.
were united with
Emphasizes a sense of unity or common purpose in the joining.
were supplemented by
Highlights the addition of something that enhances or completes the original.
were merged with
Indicates a more complete integration or blending of the entities.
were augmented by
Similar to 'supplemented', but often implies a more significant increase or addition.
were affiliated with
Suggests a formal connection or association between the entities.
were connected to
Implies a link or relationship, but not necessarily a physical joining.
were linked with
Similar to 'connected to', emphasizing the link or connection.
were consolidated with
Suggests the combination of separate items into a single more effective or coherent whole.
were integrated into
Focuses on the process of incorporating something into a larger system or structure.
FAQs
How can I use "were joined by" in a sentence?
Use "were joined by" to indicate that people or things came together or became connected. For example, "The initial team members "were joined by" new recruits." /s/were+joined+by
What are some alternatives to "were joined by"?
Alternatives include "were accompanied by", "were united with", or "were supplemented by", depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "was joined by" instead of "were joined by"?
Use "was joined by" when referring to a singular subject. For example, "The company was joined by a new CEO." Use "were joined by" for plural subjects. For example, "The original investors were joined by several venture capital firms."
What's the difference between "were joined by" and "were accompanied by"?
"Were joined by" typically implies a more deliberate coming together, while "were accompanied by" suggests simultaneous presence without necessarily implying a specific intention to unite.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested