were united with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were united with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a joining or coming together of people, groups, or entities in a formal or historical context. Example: "The two nations were united with a common goal of promoting peace and cooperation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

The reviewers observed that all the relevant units at each PoE were united with a well-organized structure, and the contribution of the staff toward the implementation of the IHR was a major strength in the implementation of core capacities at PoEs in Taiwan.

Global Health Action

They were not the future bosses the workers took them to be, the students declared, but rather were united with them in their struggle.

The New York Times

As a result of the Napoleonic Wars, the Norwegians were united with, but very much in the shadow of — if not under the heel of — the Swedes.

The New Yorker

This in 1944 was split into Nassau and Electoral Hesse (Kurhessen); but on Sept. 19, 1945, these provinces were united with the part of Hesse-Darmstadt east of the Rhine to form Greater Hesse, later called simply Hessen.

Britannica

In the romance, complex themes of love, loyalty, and personal integrity were united with a quest for spiritual truth, an amalgam that was represented in every major western European literature of the time.

Britannica

It was initially attached directly to the Austrian crown, but, following the defeat of an uprising by Hungarian nationalists in 1848, portions of Bačka, Banat, and Srem were united with it, under direct Viennese control, and given the title Vojvodina.

Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

Campania was united with Italy in 1860.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In 1423 Jülich was united with Berg and Ravensberg.

Encyclopedia Britannica

as is united with a consort, Perfect Knowledge (gnosis).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Traditionally, meatballs are fried before being united with the sauce.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"We need to be united with the refugees," she says.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were united with", ensure the context clearly indicates what entities are being joined and the nature of their union. For example, "The two companies were united with a shared vision for innovation".

Common error

Avoid using "were united with" with singular subjects. The verb "were" implies a plural subject. Instead, use "was united with" for singular subjects: "The territory was united with the kingdom".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were united with" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject has undergone the action of being joined or combined with something else. Ludwig examples show it's used in historical contexts, political unions, and even abstract concepts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Encyclopedias

32%

News & Media

32%

Science

20%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

8%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were united with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that describes the joining or merging of entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for diverse contexts, particularly historical accounts, political analyses, and scientific descriptions. While generally neutral, its presence in encyclopedias and news media suggests broad applicability. Remember to use "was united with" for singular subjects and consider related phrases like "were joined with" or "were merged with" to fine-tune the intended nuance. Avoiding the common error of using it with singular subjects ensures clarity and grammatical correctness. The phrase appears across authoritative sources like Britannica and The New York Times, indicating its reliability and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were joined together with

This alternative emphasizes the act of joining, similar to the original phrase, but uses slightly different wording.

were merged with

This implies a blending of separate entities into a single, unified whole.

were integrated with

This highlights the process of combining different parts into a functioning system.

were coupled with

Suggests a close association or pairing of elements.

were affiliated with

This denotes a formal association or connection with an organization or group.

were consolidated with

This implies the strengthening of a union by combining resources or elements.

were amalgamated with

Indicates a blending of entities, often with a loss of individual identity.

were confederated with

Suggests a uniting of states or groups for a specific purpose, while retaining some autonomy.

were leagued with

This implies a formal alliance or agreement between parties.

were in coalition with

This indicates a temporary alliance of distinct parties for a common objective.

FAQs

How can I use "were united with" in a sentence?

"Were united with" indicates that two or more entities have joined together. For instance, "The two countries "were united with" a common goal of economic stability".

What phrases are similar to "were united with"?

Similar phrases include "were joined with", "were merged with", or "were integrated with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was united with" instead of "were united with"?

The correctness depends on the subject. Use "was united with" for singular subjects (e.g., "The city was united with the province"), and "were united with" for plural subjects (e.g., "The two factions "were united with" a common cause").

What's the difference between "were united with" and "were associated with"?

"Were united with" implies a closer, more integrated relationship, often suggesting a merging or joining of entities. "Were associated with" suggests a connection or relationship but does not necessarily imply a merging.