Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were instituted
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were instituted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was established or set in place in the past, often referring to rules, systems, or organizations. Example: "New regulations were instituted to improve safety standards in the workplace."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
All protocol changes were instituted after obtaining institutional review board approval.
Science
Sanitation improvements were instituted in border markets, schools, institutions, and mass gatherings.
Science
Lessons were instituted.
News & Media
Reforms were instituted.
News & Media
Power cuts were instituted and factories closed.
News & Media
-What major policies or programs were instituted by this leader?
News & Media
Nevertheless, market-wide U.S. circuit breakers were instituted in 1988.
News & Media
The new security clearances were instituted after Sept. 11, 2001.
News & Media
When these measures were instituted, communities across the country resisted.
News & Media
During his rule, far-reaching reforms were instituted.
Encyclopedias
Nonetheless, austerity measures were instituted, including cuts in public services.
Encyclopedias
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were instituted", ensure the subject clearly indicates what is being established. For example, "New safety protocols were instituted" is clearer than "Changes were instituted."
Common error
Avoid using "were instituted" in contexts where the actor is unclear. Passive voice can obscure who implemented the changes. If possible, rephrase to use active voice for clarity: "The council instituted new regulations" instead of "New regulations were instituted."
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were instituted" functions as a passive voice construction. It is used to indicate that a particular action, typically the establishment or implementation of something such as a rule, policy, or system, has been performed. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Encyclopedias
31%
Science
36%
Less common in
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "were instituted" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction to indicate the establishment or implementation of something, like a rule or policy. According to Ludwig AI, it's a valid and useful phrase in written English.
It is commonly found in news articles, encyclopedias, and scientific publications, reflecting its formal and objective tone. When using "were instituted", clarity is key; ensure the subject is clear about what is being established. While correct, using the active voice can sometimes improve clarity.
Alternatives such as "were established" or "were implemented" can provide slight variations in meaning, depending on the specific context. Ultimately, "were instituted" serves as a reliable and informative way to communicate that something has been formally put into effect.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were established
This alternative emphasizes the act of setting up or founding something, highlighting the beginning or creation of a system or organization.
were implemented
This alternative focuses on the practical application or execution of a plan, policy, or procedure.
were introduced
This suggests the bringing forth or presentation of something new, like a law or a concept.
were enacted
This term is often used in legal or formal contexts to describe the formal passing of a law or regulation.
were brought into effect
This alternative emphasizes the operational aspect of putting something into action or making it functional.
were put in place
This highlights the act of positioning or arranging something for a specific purpose or function.
were adopted
This suggests a conscious decision to accept and use something, like a method or technology.
were initiated
This emphasizes the commencement or start of a process or action.
were commenced
Similar to 'initiated', this highlights the formal beginning of an action or process.
were set up
This is a more informal way of saying something was established, often referring to systems or organizations.
FAQs
How can I use "were instituted" in a sentence?
"Were instituted" indicates that something has been formally established or put into effect. For example, "New policies "were instituted" to address the issue."
What can I say instead of "were instituted"?
You can use alternatives like "were established", "were implemented", or "were introduced" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "institute"?
While "were instituted" (passive) is grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "The committee instituted the changes") can often provide more clarity about who or what performed the action.
What's the difference between "were instituted" and "were implemented"?
While both suggest putting something into effect, ""were instituted"" often implies a more formal or official establishment, while "were implemented" focuses more on the practical application or execution.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested