Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were in line with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were in line with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is consistent or in agreement with something else. Example: "The results of the study were in line with our initial hypotheses, confirming our expectations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Their results were in line with chance.

News & Media

The Guardian

The results were in line with expectations.

News & Media

The New York Times

Results were in line with our forecasts.

All were in line with forecasts.

News & Media

The New York Times

Sales were in line with analysts' estimates.

News & Media

The New York Times

Expectations were in line with reality.

Some analysts said the earnings were in line with expectations.

News & Media

The New York Times

The earnings were in line with analysts' estimates.

News & Media

The New York Times

The results were in line with analysts' estimates.

News & Media

The New York Times

The overall results were in line with analysts' forecasts.

Analysts said the results were in line with expectations.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were in line with", ensure that the elements being compared are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "were in line with" when describing unrelated concepts. Ensure a logical connection between the items being compared.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were in line with" functions as a comparative expression, indicating that certain results, figures, or actions corresponded or aligned with specific expectations, estimates, or guidelines. Ludwig AI indicates its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

36%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were in line with" is a versatile expression used to indicate agreement or correspondence between actual results and expectations. Ludwig AI underscores its proper usage across various fields, particularly in news, science, and business. Alternatives include "were consistent with" and "were aligned with", offering similar meanings with slight variations in nuance. To ensure clarity, always specify what is being compared and avoid using the phrase in unrelated contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "were in line with" in a sentence?

You can use "were in line with" to indicate that something is consistent with expectations, predictions, or guidelines. For instance, "The company's profits "were in line with" analysts' forecasts".

What's a good alternative to "were in line with"?

Alternatives include "were consistent with", "were in agreement with", or "were aligned with". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "were in line with" or "were consistent with"?

Both "were in line with" and "were consistent with" are correct. "Were in line with" often implies an expectation or forecast, while "were consistent with" suggests a general agreement or lack of contradiction.

What does it mean when results "were in line with" expectations?

It means the actual results were similar to what was predicted or anticipated. This often implies that there were no major surprises or deviations from the expected outcome.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: