were deemed

USAGE SUMMARY

"were deemed" is a perfectly correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to suggest a judgment or opinion has been made. For example, "Their achievements were deemed worthy of recognition by the board."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Some were deemed betrayers.

The New York Times

The slides were deemed impressive.

The New York Times - Arts

Such things were deemed unacceptable.

The Guardian

Both alternatives were deemed to be impossible.

The New York Times

Such methods were deemed very old-economy.

The Economist

Those that did not were deemed pessimistic.

The New York Times - Science

Both were deemed to be offensive.

The Guardian

(These sartorial options were deemed too titillating).

The New Yorker

"Well, because we were deemed unmanageable.

The Guardian - Music

Some, though, were deemed not qualified.

The New York Times

Because they were deemed too intimidating.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were deemed" when you want to convey a sense of formal judgment or evaluation, especially when the criteria for judgment are established or implied.

Common error

Avoid using "were deemed" in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "were considered" or "were thought to be" for a more natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were deemed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a judgment or assessment was made about a subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely used. It implies an evaluation process, often with established criteria.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

37%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were deemed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for conveying a formal judgment or evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It is most prevalent in scientific, academic, and news contexts, signifying that something has been officially assessed or judged, typically adhering to a set of established criteria. While its formal tone makes it less suitable for casual conversation, understanding its nuances and appropriate use cases is essential for precise and effective communication. Alternatives like "were considered" or "were regarded as" can be used to adjust the level of formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were considered

This alternative is more general and suggests a less formal evaluation.

were regarded as

This phrase emphasizes a particular perspective or viewpoint in the evaluation.

were judged to be

This option highlights the act of making a judgment, often implying a more formal process.

were found to be

This suggests that the conclusion was reached through investigation or discovery.

were viewed as

Similar to "were regarded as", this emphasizes a specific perspective or interpretation.

were recognized as

This option implies an acknowledgment or acceptance of a certain quality or status.

were classified as

This suggests a systematic categorization based on specific criteria.

were labeled as

This phrase implies a more definitive and potentially limiting categorization.

were thought to be

This alternative indicates a belief or opinion, often without concrete evidence.

were accounted as

This alternative is less common and suggests inclusion in a calculation or assessment.

FAQs

How can I use "were deemed" in a sentence?

The phrase "were deemed" is used to express a judgment or opinion about something, often implying a formal assessment. For example, "The results "were deemed" part of the obesity paradox".

What are some alternatives to "were deemed"?

You can use alternatives such as "were considered", "were regarded as", or "were judged to be" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "were deemed" in informal writing?

While grammatically correct, "were deemed" is generally more suitable for formal writing. In informal contexts, simpler alternatives like "were thought to be" or "were seen as" may be more appropriate.

What's the difference between "were deemed" and "were considered"?

"Were deemed" suggests a more formal or official judgment, while "were considered" implies a more general evaluation or opinion. The choice depends on the context and the level of formality you want to convey.