Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were considered

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were considered" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to emphasize that something was taken into account by someone. For example: All the ideas that were presented in the meeting were considered before we came to a final decision.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They were considered terrorists.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Two rationales were considered.

News & Media

The New Yorker

They were considered traitors.

News & Media

The New York Times

What issues were considered?

(Both were considered contraband).

News & Media

The New Yorker

"They were considered unhealthy.

"All options were considered".

News & Media

The New York Times

They were considered transgressive".

Both arms were considered.

Science & Research

Nature

All predictions were considered.

Science & Research

Nature

Sites were considered.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were considered", ensure the subject clearly identifies who did the considering. This adds clarity and strengthens the sentence.

Common error

Avoid using "were considered" excessively, as it can make your writing sound passive and less direct. Consider rephrasing to use an active voice construction where appropriate.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were considered" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject received attention or evaluation. As Ludwig AI confirms, this construction is grammatically sound and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

34%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were considered" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive verb phrase. It's used to indicate that something has been evaluated or thought about, often without specifying who did the considering. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage. While versatile, it's important to avoid overuse and opt for active voice when appropriate to maintain a direct writing style. The phrase is most commonly found in news, scientific, and academic contexts, making it suitable for both formal and neutral communication.

FAQs

How can I use "were considered" in a sentence?

Use "were considered" when you want to express that something was evaluated or regarded in a certain way. For example, "The proposals "were considered" carefully by the committee".

What are some alternatives to "were considered"?

Alternatives include "were deemed", "were regarded as", or "were viewed as", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were considered"?

While "were considered" is grammatically correct in passive voice, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and engaging. For instance, instead of "The options were considered by the team", you could write "The team considered the options".

What's the difference between "were considered" and "were being considered"?

"Were considered" implies a completed action of consideration, while "were being considered" suggests an ongoing process. For example, "The candidates "were considered" last week" versus "The candidates "were being considered" during the interviews".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: