were ascertained for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were ascertained for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that certain information or details were determined or established for a specific purpose or context. Example: "The necessary data were ascertained for the completion of the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

45 human-written examples

However, markers were ascertained for common polymorphisms.

Nature

At 10 years, academic achievement and school performance were ascertained for 118 of 125 (94%) preterm survivors and 119 of 125 (95%) term children.

The Journal of Pediatrics

Thus, three novel properties of Ag@Cu2O-Au, i.e., charge redistribution and transfer, adsorption, and catalytic reduction of organic pollutants, were ascertained for water remediation.

Applied Surface Science

To review the clinical characteristics in a series of 25 patients with VACTERL (vertebral defects, anal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia, cardiac defects, renal and limb anomalies) association who were ascertained for upper limb involvement.

The Journal of Pediatrics

Exposures were ascertained for the 15 days before the fall (case period) and six 15-day earlier periods (control periods).

Duke University

Treatment outcomes were ascertained for 225 persons.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

15 human-written examples

The productivity of the catalysts was ascertained for various metal and HPC combinations and a range of reaction conditions.

Catalysis Today

Efficiency was ascertained for five wind velocities (range: 1 5 m s− 1) and eight grain size classes (range: 10 89 μm).

Geomorphology

The impact of the studied factors could not be ascertained for the shear resistance of the adhesive coating.

International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives

Many great works of painting and sculpture, for example, were created to glorify a deity and not, insofar as can be ascertained, for an aesthetic purpose (to be enjoyed simply in the contemplation of them for their own sake).

Britannica

The affected individuals and their parents are all genotyped, whereas only the parents of unaffected individuals are genotyped, although exposures are ascertained for both affected and unaffected offspring.

The American Journal of Human Genetics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were ascertained for", ensure that the context clearly indicates what was determined and for what purpose. This helps maintain clarity and precision in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "were ascertained for" in casual or informal writing. It's more suitable for scientific, academic, or formal contexts. Simpler phrases like "were found" or "were determined" are often better choices in less formal situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were ascertained for" functions as a passive construction indicating that certain details or data points have been definitively established or determined, typically through a process of investigation or analysis. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

98%

Academia

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

News & Media

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were ascertained for" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, typically found in formal and scientific writing. It indicates that certain details or data points have been definitively established or determined for a specific purpose. While common in scientific and academic contexts, it's advisable to use simpler alternatives like "were determined for" or "were identified for" in less formal settings. Remember to ensure the subject-verb agreement is correct, using "were" with plural subjects and "was" with singular subjects.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were determined for

Emphasizes the act of making a firm decision or calculation.

were established for

Focuses on setting up or creating something for a specific reason.

were identified for

Highlights the act of recognizing or discovering something for a purpose.

were measured for

Focuses on quantifying or assessing something in relation to a specific goal.

were calculated for

Emphasizes the process of computing or figuring out something numerically.

were evaluated for

Highlights the assessment or judgment of something based on specific criteria.

were assessed for

Similar to 'evaluated', but emphasizes a more thorough and detailed analysis.

were investigated for

Focuses on a systematic or formal inquiry to discover and examine the facts.

were diagnosed for

Specifically related to identifying a condition or problem.

were verified for

Focuses on confirming the truth or accuracy of something.

FAQs

How can I use "were ascertained for" in a sentence?

The phrase "were ascertained for" is used to indicate that certain information or details were determined or established for a specific purpose. For example, "The clinical outcomes "were ascertained for" 494 (78%) of the 633 participants alive at 90 days."

What is a good alternative to "were ascertained for"?

Alternatives to "were ascertained for" include "were determined for", "were established for", or "were identified for". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Which is correct, "were ascertained for" or "was ascertained for"?

"Were ascertained for" is used with plural subjects, while "was ascertained for" is used with singular subjects. For example, "The data were ascertained for the study" vs. "The cause was ascertained for the event."

What does "ascertained" mean in the context of research?

In research, "ascertained" means to find something out for certain; to determine. So, "were ascertained for" implies that something was definitely established for a specific reason or group.