were identified for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were identified for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing subjects or items that have been recognized or designated for a specific purpose or action. Example: "The candidates were identified for their exceptional skills and experience in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Sixteen domains were identified for further abstraction.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Precipitating circumstances were identified for some patients.

Annals of Intensive Care

Forty RCTs were identified for analysis.

Sleep Medicine

Ecotoxicity criteria were identified for 143 of the 222 substances.

Environmental Sciences Europe

No definitive abnormalities were identified for any of the patients.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

In addition, the relevant stakeholders were identified for each recommendation.

European Transport Research Review

These relationships were identified for assaying the amount of CEAs.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Reference time steps were identified for specific integration scheme.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Different secondary explanatory variables were identified for the two wells.

Journal of Hydrology

No significant differences were identified for sex or race.

Journal of Voice

Optimal process schemes were identified for different brine disposal costs.

Desalination

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were identified for", ensure the context clearly specifies who or what did the identifying and the criteria used for identification. This adds clarity and credibility to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "were identified for" without specifying the purpose or context of the identification. Be specific about what the subject was identified for to prevent ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were identified for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject has been recognized or designated for a specific purpose. Ludwig AI's examples demonstrate its use in various contexts, such as scientific research and news reporting, confirming its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

85%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were identified for" is a versatile and grammatically sound passive construction used to indicate that a subject has been recognized or designated for a particular reason. Ludwig AI's analysis highlights its prevalence in scientific and news contexts, suggesting a formal to neutral register. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who or what did the identifying and the criteria used. Alternatives like "were selected for" or "were designated for" can add nuance to your writing, depending on the intended emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were designated for

Emphasizes official assignment or allocation for a specific purpose.

were selected for

Highlights the choice or picking out of certain items or individuals from a larger group.

were chosen for

Similar to "were selected for" but can imply a more deliberate or careful decision-making process.

were earmarked for

Suggests funds or resources being specifically set aside for a particular use.

were singled out for

Implies being distinguished from others, often for a specific quality or reason.

were recognized for

Focuses on acknowledgment of achievements or qualities.

were determined to be

Highlights the process of establishing something's nature or identity through investigation.

were classified as

Emphasizes categorizing items according to a specific system or criteria.

were assigned to

Highlights the allocation of items or individuals to a particular task or category.

were appointed to

Implies formal selection or designation, often for a role or position.

FAQs

How can I use "were identified for" in a sentence?

Use "were identified for" to indicate that something or someone was recognized or designated for a particular purpose. For instance, "The genes "were identified for" their role in disease resistance".

What are some alternatives to "were identified for"?

You can use phrases like "were selected for", "were chosen for", or "were designated for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were identified for"?

While both active and passive voices are grammatically correct, "were identified for" is inherently passive. Using the active voice would require restructuring the sentence to emphasize the identifier, such as "Researchers identified the genes for their role in disease resistance".

What's the difference between "were identified for" and "were recognized for"?

"Were identified for" emphasizes the process of discovering or designating something for a specific purpose, while "were recognized for" focuses on acknowledging existing qualities or achievements. The choice depends on whether you want to highlight the act of identification or the acknowledgement of inherent traits.