Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were ascertained

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were ascertained" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to information or facts that have been determined or established after investigation or analysis. Example: "The results of the experiment were ascertained through careful observation and data collection."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

However, markers were ascertained for common polymorphisms.

Science & Research

Nature

Treatment and follow-up information were ascertained.

Demographic and clinical characteristics were ascertained.

The analogous trends were ascertained on studying the polyplex solutions.

Reasons for these were ascertained and are reported here.

The locations of electrode contacts were ascertained by post-implantation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Science & Research

Nature

Deaths were ascertained from 1970 through 1992.

Nondisease-specific problems were ascertained from the Minimum Data Set.

Music preferences were ascertained at the outset of the study.

Of 6809 total participants, 127 incident HFpEF cases (1.8%) were ascertained.

Incident cancer events (n = 296) were ascertained during an average follow-up of 5.5 years.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were ascertained" when you want to emphasize that information was discovered through a careful and systematic process, often involving research or investigation.

Common error

While "were ascertained" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make writing sound indirect or unclear. Consider rephrasing to use active voice if appropriate for a more direct and engaging style, for example: "Researchers ascertained..." instead of "...were ascertained".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were ascertained" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject (e.g., facts, details, outcomes) has been definitively established or discovered. Ludwig confirms that this phrase is used to convey the idea that something has been found out through a systematic process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

Academia

22%

News & Media

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were ascertained" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, particularly in scientific and academic writing. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its correctness and prevalence. It's used to emphasize that information has been firmly established through careful investigation. While appropriate in formal contexts, writers should be mindful of potentially overusing the passive voice. Alternatives such as "were determined" or "were established" may be suitable depending on the nuance you want to convey.

FAQs

How is "were ascertained" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "were ascertained" is typically used to indicate that facts or information have been definitely established after careful investigation. For example, "The causes of the disease "were ascertained" through extensive research".

What are some alternatives to saying "were ascertained"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "were determined", "were established", or "were identified".

When is it appropriate to use "were ascertained" versus "were assumed"?

"Were ascertained" implies a process of discovery and verification, while "were assumed" suggests something was taken as true without proof. For instance, the facts "were ascertained" after review; the risk factors "were assumed" before investigation.

Is "were ascertained" formal language?

Yes, "were ascertained" is considered formal and suitable for academic, scientific, or professional writing. Less formal alternatives might include "were found out" or "were discovered" for general use.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: