we should fly

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we should fly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when suggesting or proposing the action of flying, whether literally or metaphorically, in various contexts. Example: "Considering the distance we need to cover, we should fly to our destination instead of driving."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

We should fly.

Independent

So I decided we should fly to London, and then get to Paris from there.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

This should fly in 2006.

The Economist

Sparks should fly.

The Guardian

Proud southerner and believes flag should fly.

Independent

Reluctantly, Ms. Marsh decided they should fly.

The New York Times

People should fly the England flag with pride!

Independent

Who thinks I should fly the plane?" December 27, 2016.

The New Yorker

If the weather cooperates, sparks and spray should fly.

The New York Times

Personally, I don't think they should fly the flag.

The New York Times - Sports

The weather is getting colder and the Swallow knows he should fly to the sun.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When suggesting a specific course of action involving air travel, use "we should fly" to convey a recommendation or suggestion. For example, "We should fly to the conference to save time."

Common error

Avoid using "we should fly" when expressing absolute certainty about a flight. Instead, use phrases like "we will fly" or "we are flying" to indicate a confirmed plan.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we should fly" primarily functions as a suggestion or recommendation, offering a course of action involving air travel. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for use in various contexts. Examples include suggesting flying to a destination instead of driving.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we should fly" is a grammatically sound phrase used to suggest or recommend air travel as a course of action. As confirmed by Ludwig, it finds its usage in various contexts, particularly in news, science, and general discussions. Its neutral register makes it adaptable to both formal and informal settings. Although not extremely frequent, the phrase is consistently used to propose plans or express opinions about the best way to travel, making it a valuable addition to one's vocabulary.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we ought to fly

Replaces "should" with "ought to", suggesting a slightly stronger sense of obligation or advisability.

we need to fly

Indicates a necessity for flying, emphasizing the importance of air travel in a given situation.

flying is advisable for us

Rephrases the suggestion to focus on the advisability of flying rather than a direct recommendation.

it's best if we fly

Suggests that flying is the most optimal or convenient option.

we are advised to fly

Implies an external recommendation for flying, shifting the source of the suggestion.

we would do well to fly

Offers a more polite and less direct suggestion of flying.

a flight is recommended

Rephrases the suggestion to focus on a flight.

air travel is preferable

Indicates that air travel is the better option.

let's take a flight

Proposes flying in a more informal and direct manner.

flying would be beneficial

Highlights the potential benefits of flying in the given context.

FAQs

How can I use "we should fly" in a sentence?

Use "we should fly" to suggest or recommend taking a flight, such as, "Considering the distance, "we should fly" rather than drive".

What's the difference between "we should fly" and "we must fly"?

"We should fly" implies a suggestion or recommendation, while "we must fly" suggests a necessity or obligation. The choice depends on whether it's an advisable option or a required action.

What can I say instead of "we should fly"?

You can use alternatives like "we ought to fly", "we need to fly", or "flying is advisable for us" depending on the context.

Is "we should to fly" grammatically correct?

No, "we should to fly" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""we should fly"" because "should" is a modal verb and does not require "to" before the main verb.