Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we are devoid of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we are devoid of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a lack or absence of something, often in a formal or literary context. Example: "In this discussion, we are devoid of any concrete evidence to support our claims."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
Since we are devoid of the kind of camera footage that is increasingly documenting police deception, what really happened will always be up for debate.
News & Media
We are so judged and so judgmental, and we are so in competition with others and at times even internally that we are devoid of true vehicles of sharing, of comfort -- the ultimate source of consolation.
News & Media
Confidence does not mean that we are devoid of doubt, but rather that we can move forward with a potential solution or answer and then be willing to engage in an open-minded process to further explore both the issue at hand as well as the promise of new insights.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
But we were devoid of ideas and everything.
News & Media
"We were devoid of all energy," Frank said.
News & Media
In a time where we saw the greatest loss of wealth in the history of the world, we were devoid of a message -- namely, not taking on the Bush tax boon for the wealthy".
News & Media
We were devoid of ideas and energy and it's probably the worst 45 minutes since I've been here".
News & Media
"I thought we were devoid of energy, devoid of ideas in the second period and probably it is the most disappointing 45 minutes since I've been here".
News & Media
Nottingham Forest boss Alex McLeish: "We were devoid of any ideas and legs and it was one of the worst defensive performances I've seen - it was a 'brain dead' performance.
News & Media
The error terms' residuals, which we dub TASK_FITTED, are devoid of wage compensating differences associated with the task content of the occupations (since average hourly wage of that occupation is on the right-hand side in the task-wage regression).
Science
Given that we had previously verified these cells are devoid of CASP9 (Fig. 2A ) we examined the processing of the upstream initiator caspase, pro-CASP8, in casp9−/− cells exposed to sustained stress.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we are devoid of" when you want to emphasize a complete lack or absence of something, especially in formal or literary contexts. It suggests a more profound absence than simply saying "we lack".
Common error
Avoid using "we are devoid of" in informal or casual settings, as it can sound overly formal or pretentious. Opt for simpler alternatives like "we lack" or "we don't have" in everyday conversations.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we are devoid of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating a lack or absence of something. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is usable in written English. Examples show it describing a lack of evidence or qualities.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
40%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "we are devoid of" is a grammatically correct expression used to indicate a complete lack or absence of something. Ludwig AI confirms its validity in written English. While versatile, it is most commonly found in news and media contexts and scientific writing, suggesting a formal or semi-formal register. Simpler alternatives like "we lack" or "we are without" may be more suitable for informal settings. Keep in mind "we are devoid of" usage to emphasize a profound absence, distinguishing it from mere incompleteness. Top sources for the phrase include Huffington Post, BBC, The New York Times, and The Guardian, further reinforcing its prevalence in reputable publications.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we lack
A more direct and common way to express the absence of something.
we are without
Emphasizes the absence of something, using a slightly different preposition.
we have no
A simpler and more informal way of stating the absence of something.
we possess no
A more formal way to say "we have no", emphasizing possession.
we are absent of
Indicates the absence of something but is less common than "devoid".
we are missing
Highlights the absence of something that is expected or needed.
we are wanting in
A more formal and somewhat archaic way of saying "we lack".
we are bereft of
Emphasizes a sense of loss due to the absence of something.
we are deficient in
Highlights a lack or shortage of something, often in a technical context.
we are short on
Indicates a limited quantity or insufficient amount of something.
FAQs
How can I use "we are devoid of" in a sentence?
Use "we are devoid of" to indicate a complete absence of something. For example, "In this analysis, "we are devoid of" any statistical significance".
What phrases are similar to "we are devoid of"?
Alternatives include "we lack", "we are without", or "we have no" depending on the context. "We are devoid of" implies a complete absence.
Is "we are devoid of" formal or informal?
"We are devoid of" is generally considered a formal expression. In informal settings, it's better to use simpler alternatives like "we lack" or "we don't have".
Which is correct, "we are devoid of" or "we are devoid with"?
"We are devoid of" is the correct form. The preposition "of" is used to indicate the absence of something. Using "with" would be grammatically incorrect.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested