we are without

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we are without" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a lack of something or the absence of a particular item or quality. Example: "In these challenging times, we are without the resources needed to support our community effectively."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

We are without value.

The New York Times

We are without hope.

The Guardian

" We are without seven or eight players.

The Guardian - Sport

"We wouldn't be where we are without him.

The New York Times - Sports

Even so, it's not as though we are without remedies.

The Guardian - Opinion

We wouldn't be where we are without them".

The Guardian - Sport

I am disappointed because we are without him again.

The Guardian - Sport

It is as though we are without language.

The Guardian - Opinion

It is two years today that we are without you.

The New York Times

We would never have been where we are without ending social promotion".

The New York Times

We would never be in the position we are without it.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we are without", ensure the context clearly specifies what is lacking to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of just saying "We are without," specify "We are without resources".

Common error

Avoid using "we are without" in casual conversation. Opt for simpler alternatives like "we don't have" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we are without" functions primarily as a statement indicating a lack or absence of something. This aligns with Ludwig's assessment that the phrase is correct and usable, expressing the absence of a particular item or quality. Examples show it used to express a lack of hope, resources, or even language.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we are without" is a grammatically correct phrase used to express the absence or lack of something. According to Ludwig, it's suitable for written English, especially in news and media contexts. Although versatile, it's important to consider simpler alternatives like "we lack" or "we don't have" in more informal settings. Usage examples on Ludwig illustrate its use in describing a lack of resources, hope, or necessary components. This phrase serves to clearly communicate a deficiency and influence the reader's understanding of a situation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we lack

Emphasizes a deficiency or shortage; direct and concise.

we do not have

A straightforward statement of not possessing something.

we have no

Similar to "we do not have", but can sound slightly more emphatic.

we are devoid of

More formal and literary, suggesting a complete absence.

we are absent of

Indicates something is missing or not present; less common.

we are missing

Focuses on the absence of something that is expected or needed.

we are short of

Indicates a limited supply or quantity of something.

we are deprived of

Suggests that something has been taken away or withheld.

we are wanting in

A more archaic or formal way to express a lack of something.

we find ourselves without

Adds emphasis to the current state of lacking something, often unexpectedly.

FAQs

What does "we are without" mean?

The phrase "we are without" indicates that a group or entity lacks something, such as resources, hope, or assistance.

What can I say instead of "we are without"?

You can use alternatives like "we lack", "we do not have", or "we have no" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "we are without"?

Yes, the phrase "we are without" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English to express a lack of something.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "we are without"?

It is appropriate to use "we are without" in formal writing or when you want to emphasize the absence of something significant. In informal contexts, simpler alternatives may be more suitable.