was withdrawn

USAGE SUMMARY

'was withdrawn' is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to someone or something previously in a place, or active, which is now gone or no longer in that place or active. For example: "The offer was withdrawn when the company changed its policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

His clearance was withdrawn.

The New Yorker

His invitation was withdrawn.

The Economist

The subpoena was withdrawn.

The New Yorker

The lawsuit was withdrawn.

The New York Times

The opera was withdrawn.

The Guardian

The nomination was withdrawn.

The New York Times

The plan was withdrawn.

The New York Times

Instead, consent was withdrawn.

The Guardian - Opinion

The advert was withdrawn.

The Guardian

The fine was withdrawn.

The Guardian - Opinion

He was withdrawn.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was withdrawn", ensure the subject is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify what exactly "was withdrawn": "The offer was withdrawn" not just "It was withdrawn".

Common error

Avoid using "was withdrawn" when active voice is more appropriate and direct. Instead of "The statement was withdrawn by the CEO", consider "The CEO withdrew the statement" for clarity and conciseness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was withdrawn" functions as the passive voice of the verb 'withdraw'. It is used to indicate that the subject of the sentence experienced the action of being taken back or removed. Ludwig AI's examples show it used across various contexts, highlighting its versatility.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Wiki

22%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was withdrawn" is a versatile phrase used to describe the action of something being taken back or removed. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and demonstrates its common usage across various contexts, including news, science, and general writing. While generally neutral in register, careful attention to context and subject clarity will help ensure effective communication. Related phrases like "was retracted" or "was revoked" can offer nuanced alternatives. Remember to avoid passive voice when a more direct active voice construction would enhance clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was retracted

Focuses on the cancellation or taking back of a statement or publication.

was revoked

Emphasizes the cancellation of a privilege, license, or decision.

was cancelled

Indicates that an event, plan, or arrangement did not happen as scheduled.

was repealed

Specifically refers to the annulment of a law or regulation.

was nullified

Suggests that something was made invalid or without legal force.

was rescinded

Similar to 'revoked' but can apply to a broader range of decisions or orders.

was terminated

Implies the ending of something, such as a contract or agreement.

was abandoned

Suggests something was left behind or no longer pursued.

was abolished

Emphasizes the complete removal of a system, practice, or institution.

was discontinued

Indicates the cessation of a product, service, or activity.

FAQs

How can I use "was withdrawn" in a sentence?

The phrase "was withdrawn" is used to indicate that something has been taken back or removed. For example, "The offer "was withdrawn" after further consideration".

What's the difference between "was withdrawn" and "was cancelled"?

"Was withdrawn" implies removal or retraction, often with a sense of previous approval or availability. "Was cancelled", on the other hand, suggests that something planned never happened or will not happen. For instance, an application can be withdrawn, while an event can be cancelled.

Are there synonyms for "was withdrawn"?

Yes, depending on the context, you can use phrases like "was retracted", "was revoked", or "was rescinded" to convey a similar meaning to "was withdrawn".

Is it correct to say "has been withdrawn" instead of "was withdrawn"?

Yes, both are grammatically correct, but they imply slightly different timeframes. "Was withdrawn" refers to a specific point in the past, whereas "has been withdrawn" indicates an action completed at some point before now and still relevant to the present. The choice depends on the context.