Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was retracted
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was retracted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been withdrawn or taken back, such as a statement, article, or claim. Example: "The article was retracted due to inaccuracies in the data presented."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
(He didn't have to; the decree was retracted).
News & Media
A confession by Jeannevol that he killed Blanco was retracted.
News & Media
The exclusion was retracted after Aftenposten wrote about the matter.
News & Media
"What I am told," he said on Friday, "is that the decision was retracted".
News & Media
The 9,000-word 9,000-words retrarticlend removed from Rolling Stone's wassite on 5 Apretracted
News & Media
It was retracted, and 17 lawmakers were defeated in the May primary.
News & Media
It was retracted and corrected.
News & Media
The pericardium was retracted by Lima suture [4].
Science
The patellar was retracted laterally in each case.
This was retracted ulnarly revealing the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle.
LFCN was retracted to the medial side during the procedure.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was retracted" when you want to indicate that a statement, claim, or piece of information has been formally withdrawn, often due to errors or inaccuracies. Make sure the context clearly explains why the retraction occurred.
Common error
Avoid using "was retracted" when you actually mean "was refuted". "Retracted" implies a formal withdrawal by the original source, while "refuted" means someone has proven the statement to be false.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was retracted" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something (e.g., a statement, article, claim) underwent the action of being withdrawn or taken back. As Ludwig AI states, this commonly applies when errors or inaccuracies are discovered after initial dissemination.
Frequent in
Science
36%
News & Media
58%
Formal & Business
6%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was retracted" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that a statement, claim, or publication has been formally withdrawn. According to Ludwig AI, this is often due to errors or inaccuracies discovered after the initial release. It's appropriate for both neutral and formal registers and is frequently found in news and scientific contexts. Be sure to differentiate "was retracted" from "was refuted", as the former implies a withdrawal by the original source, while the latter suggests someone else disproved the information. Related alternatives include "was withdrawn", "was rescinded", and "was taken back". Ludwig's examples and guidance can help you use this phrase effectively in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was withdrawn
Focuses on the act of taking something back, similar to a formal statement or product.
was rescinded
Similar to 'revoked' but can also apply to decisions or orders.
was taken back
A more informal way of saying something was withdrawn.
was revoked
Implies a formal cancellation of a decree, license, or privilege.
was repealed
Specifically applies to the cancellation of a law or regulation.
was recanted
Emphasizes a formal withdrawal of a statement or belief, often under oath.
was disavowed
Suggests a denial of responsibility or support for something.
was invalidated
Similar to 'nullified', often used in legal or official contexts.
was nullified
Indicates that something has been made void or ineffective.
was overturned
Often used when a previous decision or judgment is reversed.
FAQs
How to use "was retracted" in a sentence?
Use "was retracted" to indicate that a statement, claim, or publication has been withdrawn, typically because it was found to be inaccurate or invalid. For example, "The study "was retracted" after data falsification was discovered".
What can I say instead of "was retracted"?
You can use alternatives like "was withdrawn", "was rescinded", or "was taken back" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "the statement was retracted"?
Yes, it is correct. "The statement "was retracted"" means that the statement was formally withdrawn or taken back, usually due to inaccuracies or other issues.
What's the difference between "was retracted" and "was refuted"?
"Was retracted" means the original source withdrew the information, usually admitting it was flawed. "Was refuted" means someone else proved the information to be incorrect.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested