was very thorough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was very thorough" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe someone or something that has been detailed and comprehensive in their work or analysis. Example: "The report was very thorough, covering all aspects of the project and leaving no stone unturned."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

It was very thorough.

The New York Times

"He was very thorough with everything," Mr. Hildebrand said.

The New York Times

"Our prop master was very thorough," she said.

The New York Times

This was really good information, sounds like it was very thorough research.

Harvard University

"I thought he had some very good input and was very thorough".

The New York Times - Sports

Nomavenda Mathiane remembered that Masipa was "very thorough and didn't suffer fools gladly".

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

"He's very thorough".

The New York Times

"We're very thorough.

The Guardian - Sport

Mirri is very thorough.

The Guardian - Travel

Our system is very thorough.

The Guardian

The boys are very thorough.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a process or investigation, use "was very thorough" to emphasize the comprehensiveness and attention to detail involved. This assures the reader of the credibility and reliability of the work.

Common error

Avoid using "was very thorough" in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler terms like "detailed" or "complete" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was very thorough" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun or pronoun, indicating a high degree of completeness and attention to detail. Ludwig's examples confirm its role in describing investigations, processes, and reports.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Academia

12%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Science

4%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was very thorough" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe something that has been done with great care and completeness. Ludwig AI confirms its appropriateness across various contexts, particularly in News & Media and Academia. While alternatives like "extremely detailed" or "highly comprehensive" exist, "was very thorough" effectively conveys the message of meticulousness and attention to detail. It is advisable to be mindful of the context and avoid overuse in informal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was extremely detailed

Emphasizes the level of detail involved.

was highly comprehensive

Highlights the broad scope and coverage.

was exceptionally meticulous

Focuses on the precision and attentiveness to detail.

was remarkably exhaustive

Stresses the thoroughness and completeness of the effort.

was unusually painstaking

Highlights the care and effort taken.

was extraordinarily diligent

Emphasizes the persistent and careful approach.

was particularly scrupulous

Focuses on the moral or ethical care taken.

was notably methodical

Highlights the systematic and organized approach.

was surprisingly rigorous

Emphasizes the strict and demanding nature.

was impressively complete

Highlights the state of being finished or whole.

FAQs

What does "was very thorough" mean?

The phrase "was very thorough" means that something was done with great care, attention to detail, and completeness. It suggests that nothing was overlooked or missed.

How can I use "was very thorough" in a sentence?

You can use "was very thorough" to describe a person's work, an investigation, a report, or any process that requires careful attention to detail. For instance, "The detective "was very thorough" in his investigation."

What are some alternatives to "was very thorough"?

Alternatives to "was very thorough" include "was extremely detailed", "was highly comprehensive", or "was exceptionally meticulous". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was thorough" or "was very thorough"?

Both "was thorough" and "was very thorough" are grammatically correct. "Was very thorough" emphasizes the degree of thoroughness more strongly than simply "was thorough". The choice depends on the desired emphasis.