Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was highly comprehensive
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was highly comprehensive" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is very thorough or detailed, often in the context of reports, studies, or analyses. Example: "The report was highly comprehensive, covering all aspects of the project and providing in-depth analysis."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
Overall subjects commented that they felt the tool was highly comprehensive and covered all relevant areas, with clear instructions throughout.
However, our data collection was highly comprehensive, involving the distribution and recollection of the ODMs and the administration of the comprehensive oral questionnaire, including 205 questions, during home visits.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Samples from 6 selected pairs (patients against healthy controls) were searched proteomically using a workflow of extensive and precise design that is highly comprehensive.
Science
This quantitative survey of existing databases for PPIs from HT-Y2H [1]–[3], PCA [4] and LC [37] [51] studies reveals a remarkably sparse coverage of the SSU processome proteins, albeit having drawn data from interactomes purporting to be highly comprehensive.
Science
Gas microbubbles are highly comprehensive, but phospholipid coated microbubbles generate large change in resonance frequency.
'Holistic' notions are highly comprehensive and inclusive, but entail evaluation problems without being defied from producing redundancy (see Additional file 1).
Science
27 Thus, the exposure information is highly comprehensive and comparable, resulting in directly comparable alcohol attributable fractions across the selected countries.
Science
In our current literature search, several diverging techniques were applied in the beginning of the search to ensure that the resulting hits were highly comprehensive and that no studies were disregarded for the planned synthesis.
This allowed us to achieve a comprehensive assessment that was highly objective and reflective.
Formal & Business
Although UK general practice is highly computerized, comprehensive use of these computers is often limited to registration data and the issue of repeat prescriptions.
Science
This comprehensive starvation-induced remodeling of the plasma membrane was highly selective.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was highly comprehensive" when you want to emphasize that something covers a wide range of information and is very thorough. It implies that all relevant aspects have been considered.
Common error
While "was highly comprehensive" is correct, avoid overusing 'highly' with other adjectives. Overuse can weaken your writing. Instead, vary your intensifiers with words like 'very', 'extremely', or 'remarkably'.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was highly comprehensive" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase. It modifies a noun (often implied), indicating that something is characterized by its thoroughness and completeness. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
30%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was highly comprehensive" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to describe something very thorough and detailed. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability in various contexts. While alternatives like ""was very thorough"" or ""was extremely detailed"" exist, "was highly comprehensive" emphasizes a significant degree of completeness. It’s particularly useful in academic, scientific, and professional settings when conveying thoroughness and coverage are essential.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was very thorough
Replaces 'highly comprehensive' with a simpler synonym for 'thorough'.
was extremely detailed
Substitutes 'highly comprehensive' with 'extremely detailed', emphasizing the level of detail.
was remarkably complete
Uses 'remarkably complete' instead of 'highly comprehensive', highlighting the completeness aspect.
was exceptionally exhaustive
Replaces 'highly comprehensive' with 'exceptionally exhaustive', emphasizing the thorough and complete nature.
provided an in-depth analysis
Shifts from describing the subject as comprehensive to highlighting the analytical depth.
covered all relevant aspects
Focuses on the scope of coverage, ensuring all important areas were included.
left no stone unturned
An idiomatic expression indicating a thorough and complete investigation.
was all-inclusive
Emphasizes that everything was included, changing from the idea of being thorough to including everything.
painted a complete picture
Uses a metaphor to convey the idea of thoroughness and completeness.
was broad in scope
Highlights the breadth and extent of the subject matter covered.
FAQs
How can I use "was highly comprehensive" in a sentence?
You can use "was highly comprehensive" to describe a report, study, or analysis that is very thorough and covers all relevant aspects. For example: "The report "was highly comprehensive", providing a detailed overview of the project."
What are some alternatives to "was highly comprehensive"?
Alternatives include "was very thorough", "was extremely detailed", or "was remarkably complete". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "was highly comprehensive" or "was very comprehensive"?
Both phrases are correct, but "was highly comprehensive" emphasizes a greater degree of thoroughness and completeness than "was very comprehensive". The choice depends on the context and the level of emphasis you want to convey.
What does it mean when something is described as "highly comprehensive"?
It means that it is very thorough, detailed, and covers all relevant aspects. It suggests that nothing important has been left out.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested