was very complete

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'was very complete' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you want to emphasize something that is complete in a thorough manner. For example: After reading the report, I could tell the author had done their research - it was very complete.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Given that Gray's description was very complete, while either term seems usable, one could argue historical precedence for SPG.

Cephalalgia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

On the way we walked through Crown's grand entrance, which like the rest of the building was very "completed in 1997".

Vice

"They are very complete and they like to compete.

The New York Times - Sports

We are very complete as a football side and we have to be proud of that".

The Guardian - Sport

"It doesn't have quite the panache as something which is very complete," he said.

The New York Times

"She's very complete in her examinations and assessments and a very caring physician," said Mary Nicosia, a nurse practitioner who is director of the clinic.

The New York Times

This world, based in part on McDermott's own youth, but with noble precedents in literature—"Dubliners," "A Tree Grows in Brooklyn"—is very complete.

The New Yorker

Iniesta said: "We all want Cesc to come because he will help us to go up a level – he's very complete.

Independent

He is very complete: he can push up and play behind the strikers scoring a lot of goals, he has a great shot; he can sit deeper and play, he has superb technique and vision and passes brilliantly.

The Guardian - Sport

"We're very complete and evenhanded in our reporting.

Forbes

But it's very complete and you have to spend some time to read everything.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, consider replacing "very complete" with more specific adjectives like 'exhaustive', 'thorough', or 'comprehensive' depending on the context.

Common error

Avoid using "was very complete" without specifying what is complete. For instance, instead of saying "The project was very complete", clarify with "The project was very complete in its data analysis and final report."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was very complete" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun. According to Ludwig AI, it indicates that something has been brought to a full or finished state with thoroughness and attention to detail. The adjective "complete" is intensified by the adverb "very".

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

60%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was very complete" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to emphasize the thoroughness of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and suitable for various contexts. While versatile, it's best to ensure the context clearly specifies what is considered complete. For more precise communication, consider using synonyms like "comprehensive" or "exhaustive". The phrase appears most commonly in scientific and news contexts, indicating its broad applicability. While generally correct, specific wording to improve clarity is recommended.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was highly comprehensive

Replaces "complete" with "comprehensive" to emphasize the thoroughness.

was extremely thorough

Uses "thorough" instead of "complete" and "extremely" to amplify the degree.

was exceptionally detailed

Focuses on the level of detail using "detailed" instead of "complete".

was remarkably exhaustive

Emphasizes the comprehensive nature using "exhaustive".

was entirely full

Uses 'full' to mean that the thing lacks of nothing.

was quite exhaustive

Uses "exhaustive" and "quite" to reflect a slightly lesser degree of comprehensiveness.

was very extensive

Highlights the breadth and scope using "extensive".

was really comprehensive

Uses "really" as an informal intensifier for "comprehensive".

was absolutely thorough

Increases the emphasis on being thorough with "absolutely".

was virtually all-encompassing

Indicates that almost everything is included or covered using "all-encompassing".

FAQs

How can I use "was very complete" in a sentence?

You can use "was very complete" to describe something thorough or exhaustive. For example, "The report "was very complete" and left no questions unanswered."

What are some alternatives to "was very complete"?

Alternatives include "was highly comprehensive", "was extremely thorough", or "was exceptionally detailed" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "was complete" or "was very complete"?

Using "was very complete" adds emphasis, but "was complete" is often sufficient. The choice depends on how strongly you want to express the completeness. Consider whether the added emphasis is necessary for your context.

What does it mean when something "was very complete"?

It means something was thorough, comprehensive, and left little to nothing out. This implies a high level of detail and attention to all relevant aspects of the subject or task.