was verified with

USAGE SUMMARY

"was verified with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something was confirmed or validated by another source. For example: The customer's identity was verified with the passport office.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The model was verified with three cases.

Ecological Modelling

The model was verified with experimental data in the literature.

Energy Procedia

The improved model was verified with an engineering example.

Water Science and Engineering

The numerical model was verified with the available analytical solutions.

Renewable Energy

The optimized model was verified with the FRANC2D software.

Materials & Design

The sample quality was verified with the DNA 1000 Assay on an Agilent Bioanalyzer.

Nature

This increase in ERK phosphorylation was verified with a second siRNA to PTPRS (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Nature

The assumption of normality was verified with the Kolmogorov Smirnov test.

Nature

Flame uniformity was verified with an Abel inversion technique.

Combustion and Flame

The model was verified with data from 2009 to 2013.

Journal of Hydrology

Cross-linking of PP was verified with SEC.

Polymer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was verified with", ensure the method or tool used for verification is clearly stated to provide context and enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "was verified with" without specifying the means of verification. Saying "the data was verified" is less effective than "the data was verified with statistical analysis".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was verified with" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that something has been confirmed or validated by a specific method or source. It is commonly used to establish the reliability and accuracy of findings, models, or procedures. Ludwig AI confirms this is a correct and usable form.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

94%

News & Media

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was verified with" is a grammatically correct and very common expression used to indicate that something has been confirmed or validated using a specific method or tool. According to Ludwig AI, it is a usable phrase in written English. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it serves to enhance the credibility of findings by demonstrating that they have undergone a validation process. When using this phrase, it's important to clearly state the method of verification to ensure clarity and avoid vagueness. Alternatives include phrases like "was validated by" or "was confirmed through", which offer similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis. Ludwig's analysis of numerous examples highlights its reliability and widespread use in authoritative sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was validated by

Focuses on the act of confirming the accuracy or legitimacy of something.

was confirmed through

Highlights the process through which the confirmation was achieved.

was corroborated by

Emphasizes the strengthening of evidence through an independent source.

was substantiated by

Suggests the provision of evidence to support the truth of something.

was checked against

Implies a comparison to ensure accuracy.

was proven by

Indicates that something has been conclusively demonstrated to be true.

was assessed using

Highlights the evaluation process that something has undergone.

was determined by

Shows how something was ascertained or decided.

was tested via

Emphasizes the method or tool that was used for testing.

was authenticated by

Highlights the act of proving that something is genuine.

FAQs

How can I use "was verified with" in a sentence?

Use "was verified with" to indicate that a claim, result, or method has been confirmed by a specific tool, technique, or data source. For instance, "The model's accuracy was verified with experimental data."

What are some alternatives to "was verified with"?

Consider using phrases like "was validated by", "was confirmed through", or "was corroborated by" for variety.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was verified with"?

While "was verified with" is in the passive voice, it's often appropriate in scientific and technical writing where the focus is on the result rather than the actor. However, active voice can sometimes be clearer: "We verified the results with simulations".

What's the difference between "was verified with" and "was confirmed with"?

While similar, "was confirmed with" often implies a more straightforward validation, while "was verified with" can suggest a more rigorous or detailed examination. They are often interchangeable.