Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was tested with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was tested with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was tested in some way with a particular thing. For example: "The new product was tested with various market strategies before its launch."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
It was tested with crash test dummies.
News & Media
The prototype capsule was tested with a malaria drug called ivermectin.
News & Media
The site, which took five months to develop, was tested with focus groups.
News & Media
Statistical significance was tested with χ2 test.
Each sample was tested with 12 sensors.
Science
Our model was tested with path analysis.
Science
This apparatus was tested with distilled water.
The engine was tested with helium.
Science
The system was tested with blood serum.
Accuracy was tested with standard addition method.
Normality was tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was tested with", ensure that the subject of the sentence clearly indicates what is being tested and the 'with' phrase specifies the means or method used for testing. This ensures clarity and precision in your writing.
Common error
Avoid ambiguity by clearly stating what is being tested. Instead of writing "It was tested with the new method", specify "The prototype was tested with the new method" to ensure the reader understands what 'it' refers to.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was tested with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject underwent a process of examination or trial. It specifies the means or instrument used during this examination. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is correct and usable.
Frequent in
Science
85%
News & Media
10%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was tested with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, especially within scientific and news contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it effectively conveys that a subject underwent testing using a specific tool, method, or substance. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly stating the subject being tested and the means of testing. While alternatives like "was examined using" or "was analyzed via" exist, "was tested with" remains a direct and widely accepted choice for describing testing methodologies. Its formal tone aligns well with academic and professional discourse.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was examined using
Focuses on the process of examination as the primary action, implying a more detailed inspection.
was analyzed via
Highlights the analytical aspect of the test, suggesting a focus on data and interpretation.
was assessed with
Emphasizes the evaluation aspect, suggesting a judgement or determination of value.
was evaluated through
Focuses on the process of evaluation and the means by which it was conducted.
was subjected to
Implies a process, often rigorous, that something or someone is made to endure.
was treated with
Specifically implies that something has undergone treatment using a certain substance or method.
was verified using
Highlights the verification process, suggesting an effort to confirm the truth or accuracy of something.
was validated with
Similar to 'verified', but often used in more formal or scientific contexts to confirm the reliability or effectiveness of something.
was experimented on with
Focuses on the experimental nature of the test, implying a more exploratory approach.
was investigated for
Highlights the aspect of investigation, focusing on discovering or examining the potential of something.
FAQs
How can I use "was tested with" in a sentence?
Use "was tested with" to indicate that something underwent a trial or examination using a specific method or tool. For example, "The new drug "was tested with" a control group to assess its efficacy".
What are some alternatives to "was tested with"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "was examined using", "was analyzed via", or "was evaluated through".
What is the difference between "was tested with" and "was evaluated with"?
"Was tested with" generally refers to a trial or experiment, while "was evaluated with" implies a judgment or assessment based on specific criteria or standards.
Is it correct to say "was tested by" instead of "was tested with"?
While both can be correct, ""was tested with"" typically specifies the tool or method used in the test, while "was tested by" indicates who or what conducted the test.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested