Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was evaluated with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was evaluated with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the method or criteria used to assess something in a study or analysis. Example: "The new drug was evaluated with a series of clinical trials to determine its effectiveness."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Their integrity was evaluated with a denaturing formaldehyde gel.
Science & Research
Statistical significance was evaluated with Student's t-test.
Science & Research
RNA integrity was evaluated with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).
Science & Research
The similarity of mutation signatures was evaluated with cosnine similarity >0.9, which suggested common signatures.
Science & Research
The alteration in the F-value was evaluated with respect to pain.
Science & Research
After 1 or 3 days, cell viability was evaluated with live/dead staining.
Science & Research
Statistical support was evaluated with the nonparametric bootstrap test using 200 replications.
Science & Research
The predictive power of the model was evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC 68.
Science & Research
Completeness of gene-space representation was evaluated with the BUSCO pipeline23 (Extended Data Fig. 2b).
Science & Research
Protein purity was evaluated with sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Science & Research
The TKciteGK construct was evaluated with three promoters: CMV, EF1alpha, and SM22alpha.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was evaluated with", ensure that the method or tool used for evaluation is clearly and specifically stated to provide clarity and context.
Common error
Avoid using "was evaluated with" without specifying the evaluation method. For example, instead of saying "the product was evaluated with tests", specify what kind of tests were used such as "the product was evaluated with stress tests and usability testing".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was evaluated with" functions as part of the passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received an evaluation. It signifies the method or tool employed during the evaluation process. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and appropriate for use in formal writing.
Frequent in
Science
60%
Academia
40%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was evaluated with" is a grammatically correct and common expression used to describe the methods employed in an assessment. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is suitable for formal writing, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. When using this phrase, it's essential to specify the evaluation method clearly. Alternatives such as "was assessed using" or "was examined through" can be used to vary your writing. The phrase finds frequent usage in scientific and academic domains, highlighting its role in research and analytical reporting.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was assessed using
Focuses on the method of assessment, similar to "was evaluated with", but emphasizes the tool or technique employed.
was examined through
Highlights the process of examination, suggesting a more detailed and investigative approach.
was tested via
Emphasizes the testing procedure used to evaluate the subject.
was analyzed by means of
Suggests a thorough analysis, often using specific tools or techniques.
was investigated with
Implies a deeper inquiry and exploration using the specified method.
was measured using
Specifically indicates the use of measurement tools or techniques to quantify something.
was checked by
Focuses on the act of verifying or confirming something using a particular method.
was determined through
Emphasizes that a conclusion or result was reached based on a specific method.
was appraised with
Indicates a judgment or estimation of value or quality using the specified criteria.
was rated according to
Suggests a structured evaluation based on predefined standards or scales.
FAQs
How can I use "was evaluated with" in a sentence?
Use "was evaluated with" to describe the specific method or criteria employed to assess something. For example, "The effectiveness of the treatment "was evaluated with" a double-blind study."
What are some alternatives to "was evaluated with"?
You can use alternatives such as "was assessed using", "was examined through", or "was tested via" depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.
Is it better to use "was evaluated with" or "was evaluated by"?
"Was evaluated with" is used to specify the method or tool used in the evaluation, while "was evaluated by" indicates who or what conducted the evaluation. For example, "The data "was evaluated with" statistical software" versus "The data was evaluated by the research team."
Can "was evaluated with" be used in non-scientific contexts?
Yes, although it is commonly used in scientific and academic writing, "was evaluated with" can also be used in other contexts where a formal assessment is described. For example, "The employee's performance "was evaluated with" a performance review rubric."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested