was tested for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was tested for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the examination or evaluation of something for a specific purpose or condition. Example: "The new drug was tested for its effectiveness in treating the disease."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There, he was tested for talent, and he failed.

The New York Times

The area surrounding the lemon containers was tested for biohazards.

The New York Times

She was tested for Down syndrome and other chromosomal disorders.

The New York Times

ON DECEMBER 1st Rick Warren was tested for HIV.

The Economist

Rumen content was tested for electrochemical reaction.

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Also, the dataset was tested for asymmetry using skewness.

Geochemical Transactions

SCC was tested for both its fresh and hardened properties.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

None of theses scores was tested for reproducibility.

Insights into Imaging

The selected R. stolonifer was tested for the chitinase production.

AMB Express

For hardened properties SCC was tested for its compressive strength.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

Each case was tested for at least 15 times.

Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was tested for", ensure the context clearly states what is being tested and the purpose of the test to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify "The water was tested for contaminants".

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice. While "was tested for" is grammatically correct, consider active voice constructions for a more direct and engaging style. For example, instead of "The product was tested for durability", try "Engineers tested the product for durability".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was tested for" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject underwent a process of examination or evaluation. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and commonly used, appearing in contexts ranging from science to news reporting. The core function is to show that an evaluation occurred.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

73%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Academia

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was tested for" is a grammatically sound and highly prevalent expression, functioning as a passive construction used to describe a process of examination or evaluation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, particularly in scientific and news-related reporting. Usage guidance emphasizes clarity in stating what is being tested and the purpose of the test. Alternatives include "was examined for", "was evaluated for", and "was assessed for", each offering subtle nuances in meaning. Given its frequency and clear purpose, "was tested for" remains a valuable tool for precise and informative writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was examined for

Replaces "tested" with "examined", implying a closer, more detailed look.

was evaluated for

Substitutes "tested" with "evaluated", suggesting an assessment of value or quality.

was assessed for

Uses "assessed" instead of "tested", focusing on the process of determining the significance or importance.

underwent testing for

Replaces the passive voice with a more active construction, indicating a process was carried out.

was analyzed to determine

Expands the phrase to specify the purpose of the testing as determination.

was investigated regarding

Uses "investigated" implying a deeper inquiry, and "regarding" to introduce the subject.

was checked to see if

More conversational, indicating a check for a specific condition or trait.

was subjected to tests for

Highlights that tests were actively performed on the subject.

had tests conducted for

Emphasizes the action of conducting tests, altering the focus slightly.

was verified in terms of

Implies that something was confirmed or proven with respect to particular characteristics.

FAQs

How can I use "was tested for" in a sentence?

Use "was tested for" to indicate that something underwent examination to determine the presence or quality of a specific attribute. For example, "The patient "was tested for diabetes"".

What are some alternatives to "was tested for"?

You can use alternatives like "was examined for", "was evaluated for", or "was assessed for" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was tested to" instead of "was tested for"?

No, it is generally incorrect to say "was tested to". The correct preposition to use is "for", as in "was tested for a specific purpose or substance.

What does it mean when something "was tested for" something else?

It means that the subject underwent a procedure to determine if it possesses a particular quality, condition, or substance. For example, if a sample "was tested for bacteria", the aim was to find out if bacteria were present.