Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was evaluated for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was evaluated for" is correct and usable in written English.
Depending on the context, it can mean to have something evaluated, considered, or judged. For example, "The candidate was evaluated for their qualifications and was found to be a good fit for the position."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No system was evaluated for all the evaluation criteria.

She developed joint pain, so she was evaluated for autoimmune disorders like lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.

Goodman said: "He was evaluated for his illness, which was very nondescript.

News & Media

The Guardian

Heterogeneity was evaluated for each stratified analysis.

Timing of surgery was evaluated for patients with peritonitis.

Relative inflammatory reaction intensity was evaluated for each groups.

To evaluate visibility, distinctiveness was evaluated for each image.

Catalytic performance of the samples was evaluated for methanol combustion.

Item invariance was evaluated for important patient subgroups.

Analytical performance was evaluated for precision, sensitivity and specificity.

Ancillary hERG activity was evaluated for this series of inhibitors.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was evaluated for", ensure the subject being evaluated and the criteria for evaluation are clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The program was evaluated for its effectiveness in reducing recidivism."

Common error

Avoid using "was evaluated for" without specifying the parameters or the context of the evaluation. For instance, instead of saying "The project was evaluated", specify "The project was evaluated for its cost-effectiveness and impact on community engagement."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was evaluated for" functions as a passive construction verb phrase. It indicates that the subject received an evaluation, shifting the focus from the evaluator to the entity being evaluated. This is supported by Ludwig, which provides numerous examples of its usage across diverse fields.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

76%

News & Media

11%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was evaluated for" is a versatile and commonly used passive construction indicating that a subject has undergone an assessment. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical status is correct, and it finds frequent usage in scientific, news, and formal business contexts. To use this phrase effectively, ensure you clearly specify the evaluation criteria. Related phrases like "was assessed regarding" or "underwent assessment for" can provide nuanced alternatives. Avoid ambiguity by always clarifying the context and parameters of the evaluation to maintain precision in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "was evaluated for" in a sentence?

Use "was evaluated for" to indicate that something or someone underwent a process of assessment or judgment. For example, "The new policy "was evaluated for" its potential impact on small businesses".

What are some alternatives to "was evaluated for"?

Alternatives include "was assessed regarding", "was examined concerning", or "underwent assessment for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "was evaluated for" and "was assessed for"?

While "was evaluated for" and "was assessed for" are often used interchangeably, "evaluated" suggests a more in-depth analysis leading to a judgment, whereas "assessed" implies a more general appraisal. Consider the context to choose the most appropriate term.

What should I keep in mind when using the phrase "was evaluated for"?

Ensure that the criteria and scope of the evaluation are clear to avoid ambiguity. Specify what aspects were considered during the evaluation process to provide a comprehensive understanding.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: