Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was tested against

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was tested against" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a comparison or evaluation of something, typically in a scientific or experimental context. Example: "The new drug was tested against a placebo to determine its effectiveness."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Assay stability was tested against humic substances and organic solvents.

Science

Steroids

The I2M2 was tested against an independent data set.

Antimicrobial activity of the AgNPs was tested against Aeromonas hydrophila.

Numerical accuracy of the model was tested against analytical solutions.

The specificity of each probe was tested against 24 species.

First, their efficacy was tested against some yeasts.

The sensitivity of the analyses was tested against different probability weightings for each scenario.

Second, θnew was tested against the Metropolis criterion to accept or reject.

Science & Research

Nature

No hypersensitivity was observed when the cydKO mutant was tested against 15 17.

Science & Research

Nature

The model was tested against data taken on the ground under controlled conditions - also shown in Figure 6.22.

A newly-developed detailed mechanism of soot oxidation was tested against experimental observations.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was tested against", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being evaluated and what it is being compared to. Be specific about the criteria used for testing.

Common error

Avoid using "was tested against" without clearly defining the standards or benchmarks used. For example, instead of saying "The software was tested against industry standards", specify which standards were used and how they were measured.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was tested against" functions as a passive construction indicating a comparison or evaluation. Ludwig AI shows this phrase is commonly used to describe how something has been assessed in relation to something else.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

90%

Academia

5%

News & Media

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was tested against" is a common and grammatically correct construction used to describe the evaluation of something in comparison to a standard, control, or alternative. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's most frequently found in scientific and academic writing. When using this phrase, clarity is key; ensure the context clearly defines what is being tested and the basis for comparison. While alternatives like "was evaluated against" or "was compared with" exist, "was tested against" is direct and effective in conveying a structured assessment.

FAQs

How can I use "was tested against" in a sentence?

Use "was tested against" to indicate that something was evaluated in comparison to something else. For example, "The new algorithm "was tested against" existing algorithms to assess its efficiency".

What are some alternatives to "was tested against"?

Alternatives include "was evaluated against", "was compared with", or "was assessed with respect to", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "was tested against" or "was tested with"?

"Was tested against" is generally used to indicate a comparison or competition, while "was tested with" suggests the tools or conditions used during testing. The choice depends on the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "was tested against" and "was validated using"?

"Was tested against" implies a comparative evaluation, whereas "was validated using" indicates that something was confirmed or proven through a specific method or data.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: