Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was evaluated against
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was evaluated against" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the criteria or standards used to assess something, such as a project, product, or performance. Example: "The new software was evaluated against industry standards to ensure its effectiveness and reliability."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Compound 5 was evaluated against ant-microbial activity.
Science
A collection of 37 compounds was evaluated against both enzymes.
Their bioactivity was evaluated against Botrytis cinerea in vitro.
Film antimicrobial activity was evaluated against Listeria monocytogenes.
Reconstruction quality was evaluated against the ground-truth estimates generated from IR scans.
The antimicrobial activity of AgNP was evaluated against Escherichia coli by cup diffusion method.
The performance of the proposed scheme was evaluated against attackers of varying levels of sophistication.
The antibacterial activity of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles was evaluated against E. coli pathogen.
The antifungal activity of the extracted and prepared nanoparticles was evaluated against C. albicans strain.
The model performance was evaluated against measured data obtained from several system closure experiments.
Science
It was evaluated against a PThreads-based multiprocessor based on the Sparc-V8 ISA.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was evaluated against", clearly state the criteria or standards used for the evaluation to provide context and ensure clarity for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "was evaluated against" without specifying the benchmark. For example, instead of saying "The product was evaluated against competitors", specify which aspects were compared, such as "The product's performance was evaluated against competitors' battery life and processing speed".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was evaluated against" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has been assessed or judged in relation to a specific standard, benchmark, or criterion. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is frequently used in scientific and formal contexts.
Frequent in
Science
98%
Formal & Business
1%
News & Media
1%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was evaluated against" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something has been assessed in relation to a specific standard or benchmark. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's most frequently used in formal and scientific writing. To ensure clarity, always specify the criteria used for evaluation. Alternatives such as "was assessed in relation to" or "was compared with" can be used depending on the context, but "was evaluated against" is particularly useful when emphasizing a structured and objective assessment.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was assessed in relation to
This phrase focuses on the assessment being made considering a particular factor or standard.
was measured against
This alternative highlights a more quantitative comparison, emphasizing a specific metric.
was tested against
This phrase suggests a more rigorous, experimental comparison to a set standard.
was benchmarked against
This option emphasizes the use of an established benchmark for comparison.
was compared with
This is a more general term for showing similarities and differences.
was judged in comparison to
Focuses on the act of judging based on a direct comparison.
was checked against
Implies verification against a set of requirements or criteria.
was validated against
Emphasizes the validation or confirmation of something using a specific standard.
was rated according to
This focuses on a rating or scoring system based on set criteria.
was analyzed with respect to
This phrase highlights a thorough analysis considering a specific aspect or factor.
FAQs
How can I use "was evaluated against" in a sentence?
You can use "was evaluated against" to describe how something was assessed in comparison to a specific standard or benchmark. For example, "The new drug "was evaluated against" the existing treatment to determine its efficacy".
What are some alternatives to using "was evaluated against"?
Some alternatives include "was assessed in relation to", "was measured against", or "was compared with" depending on the context.
Is it better to use "was evaluated against" or "was evaluated with"?
"Was evaluated against" is typically used when assessing something in comparison to a standard or benchmark. "Was evaluated with" would refer to the tools or methods used during an evaluation. Therefore, "was evaluated against" is more appropriate when comparing to something else.
What's the difference between "was evaluated against" and "was assessed against"?
While both phrases are similar, "evaluated" often implies a more formal or structured assessment, whereas "assessed" can refer to a more general or informal appraisal. Therefore, "was evaluated against" is usually a better choice for academic or scientific reporting.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested