Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was evaluated against

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was evaluated against" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the criteria or standards used to assess something, such as a project, product, or performance. Example: "The new software was evaluated against industry standards to ensure its effectiveness and reliability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Compound 5 was evaluated against ant-microbial activity.

A collection of 37 compounds was evaluated against both enzymes.

Their bioactivity was evaluated against Botrytis cinerea in vitro.

Film antimicrobial activity was evaluated against Listeria monocytogenes.

Reconstruction quality was evaluated against the ground-truth estimates generated from IR scans.

The antimicrobial activity of AgNP was evaluated against Escherichia coli by cup diffusion method.

The performance of the proposed scheme was evaluated against attackers of varying levels of sophistication.

The antibacterial activity of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles was evaluated against E. coli pathogen.

The antifungal activity of the extracted and prepared nanoparticles was evaluated against C. albicans strain.

The model performance was evaluated against measured data obtained from several system closure experiments.

It was evaluated against a PThreads-based multiprocessor based on the Sparc-V8 ISA.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was evaluated against", clearly state the criteria or standards used for the evaluation to provide context and ensure clarity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "was evaluated against" without specifying the benchmark. For example, instead of saying "The product was evaluated against competitors", specify which aspects were compared, such as "The product's performance was evaluated against competitors' battery life and processing speed".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was evaluated against" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has been assessed or judged in relation to a specific standard, benchmark, or criterion. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is frequently used in scientific and formal contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

Formal & Business

1%

News & Media

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was evaluated against" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something has been assessed in relation to a specific standard or benchmark. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's most frequently used in formal and scientific writing. To ensure clarity, always specify the criteria used for evaluation. Alternatives such as "was assessed in relation to" or "was compared with" can be used depending on the context, but "was evaluated against" is particularly useful when emphasizing a structured and objective assessment.

FAQs

How can I use "was evaluated against" in a sentence?

You can use "was evaluated against" to describe how something was assessed in comparison to a specific standard or benchmark. For example, "The new drug "was evaluated against" the existing treatment to determine its efficacy".

What are some alternatives to using "was evaluated against"?

Some alternatives include "was assessed in relation to", "was measured against", or "was compared with" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "was evaluated against" or "was evaluated with"?

"Was evaluated against" is typically used when assessing something in comparison to a standard or benchmark. "Was evaluated with" would refer to the tools or methods used during an evaluation. Therefore, "was evaluated against" is more appropriate when comparing to something else.

What's the difference between "was evaluated against" and "was assessed against"?

While both phrases are similar, "evaluated" often implies a more formal or structured assessment, whereas "assessed" can refer to a more general or informal appraisal. Therefore, "was evaluated against" is usually a better choice for academic or scientific reporting.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: