was soaked through

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was soaked through" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has absorbed a significant amount of liquid, typically referring to clothing or materials. Example: "After being caught in the rain without an umbrella, my shirt was soaked through and clung to my skin."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

I was soaked through.

The Guardian - Sport

I was soaked through to the skin.

The New Yorker

His vulpine teeth flashed, and his black dress shirt was soaked through.

The New York Times - Arts

My jacket was soaked through, my hair hanging in my face.

The New Yorker

The bandage swathing the man's shoulder and arm was soaked through with blood.

The New York Times

She was soaked through, and claimed to have cried herself awake - which is quite a skill.

The Guardian - Music

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

You're soaked through!

The Guardian - Travel

If the bandage is soaking through very quickly or the site is bleeding, or the site around the stitches is puffy and red, the patient runs a fever or is feeling intense pain, always call the doctor.

WikiHow

The TiO2, used as photoanode, was soaking through N719 dye-sensitized solution and dried in air.

Nanoscale Research Letters

"Before we knew it the water was soaking through our home.

Unicef

"My clothes are soaked through.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was soaked through" to vividly describe a state of complete wetness in clothing or materials, conveying the feeling of being saturated and often uncomfortable. Consider the context: is it due to rain, sweat, or another liquid?

Common error

While "was soaked through" is perfectly acceptable, avoid overuse in formal or technical writing. In those settings, more precise terms like "saturated" or "permeated" may be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was soaked through" functions as a passive verb phrase, describing the state of something or someone being completely saturated with liquid. It is used to convey a sense of thorough wetness, as shown in Ludwig's examples, such as "My jacket "was soaked through", my hair hanging in my face."

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Wiki

16%

Science

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was soaked through" is a common and grammatically correct passive verb phrase used to describe a state of complete saturation with liquid. Ludwig examples indicate its prevalence in describing personal experiences or observations in news and general writing. While versatile, it's less suited for highly formal contexts where more precise terms might be preferred. Ludwig AI has confirmed its accurate and usable status, further solidifying its position as a standard expression for conveying thorough wetness. Therefore, when aiming for vivid description, "was soaked through" remains a reliable choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was drenched

Emphasizes being completely and heavily wet, suggesting a more sudden or forceful wetting than simply "soaked".

was saturated

Implies a state of being completely filled with liquid to the point where no more can be absorbed.

was wet through

A more literal alternative, simply stating the condition of being wet from one side to the other.

was waterlogged

Suggests an excessive amount of water, often implying a negative effect or damage.

was steeped

Implies immersion and saturation, often used in contexts involving liquids that infuse or penetrate.

was permeated

Indicates that something has spread throughout, saturating the entirety.

was completely wet

A straightforward description of being entirely covered in water.

was dripping wet

Highlights the excess of water, indicating that water is actively falling from the object or person.

had absorbed moisture

Focuses on the act of taking in liquid rather than the state of being wet.

was infused with water

Suggests a gentle or gradual penetration of water into something.

FAQs

How can I use "was soaked through" in a sentence?

You can use "was soaked through" to describe something that is completely saturated with liquid. For example, "After the rainstorm, my coat "was soaked through"."

What is the difference between "was soaked through" and "was drenched"?

"Was drenched" implies a more sudden and forceful soaking, while "was soaked through" suggests a more gradual saturation. You might say "I "was drenched" by the bucket of water" but "My clothes "was soaked through" after walking in the rain for an hour."

Are there any formal alternatives to "was soaked through"?

Yes, in formal writing, consider using "was saturated" or "was permeated" as alternatives to "was soaked through". These options often sound more professional and technical.

Is it correct to say "were soaked through" instead of "was soaked through"?

Yes, use "were soaked through" when referring to plural subjects. For example, "Our clothes "were soaked through" after the hike."