Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was drenched
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was drenched" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe someone or something that has been thoroughly soaked with water or another liquid. Example: "After walking in the rain without an umbrella, I was drenched by the time I got home."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Sports
Lifestyle
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Within seconds I was drenched.
News & Media
I was drenched within one minute.
News & Media
I was drenched within seconds.
News & Media
Vandenberge was drenched in blood.
News & Media
To her, he was drenched in glamour.
News & Media
His shirt was drenched in blood.
News & Media
Chambers was drenched in rain and sweat.
News & Media
VENUS WILLIAMS was drenched with sweat.
News & Media
He was drenched at the end".
News & Media
The New York area was drenched again on Monday.
News & Media
In the end, it was drenched in controversy.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a state of being completely wet, consider the context. "Was drenched" implies a thorough soaking, often unexpectedly or intensely.
Common error
Avoid using "was drenched" in contexts where a more nuanced term like "imbued", "filled", or "suffused" would be more appropriate. "Was drenched" is strongest when describing literal wetness.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was drenched" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received the action of being soaked or saturated. Ludwig AI examples show its usage in describing both literal and figurative situations.
Frequent in
News & Media
60%
Sports
15%
Lifestyle
10%
Less common in
Science
5%
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was drenched" is a commonly used passive verb phrase that describes a state of being thoroughly soaked or saturated. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and frequently found in news and media contexts. While "was soaked" is a close synonym, "was drenched" often implies a sudden or intense soaking. Be mindful of the figurative uses, ensuring that the context warrants the strong imagery of being drenched. Remember that while neutral, the context where "was drenched" is found impacts the writing and its interpretation.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was soaked
Similar meaning, focuses on saturation with liquid.
was saturated
Emphasizes the completeness of the wetness or coverage.
was completely wet
More explicit description of being fully wet.
was waterlogged
Specifically implies being excessively saturated with water.
was doused
Focuses on the action of pouring liquid over something.
was thoroughly moistened
A more formal way of expressing being wet.
was imbued with
Figurative sense of being filled or permeated with something.
was steeped in
Suggests being immersed or saturated in a substance or quality.
was swimming in
Hyperbolic way of saying something is covered in liquid.
was awash in
Similar to swimming in, implying abundance or excess.
FAQs
How can I use "was drenched" in a sentence?
Use "was drenched" to describe someone or something that is thoroughly soaked with liquid. For example: "After the sudden downpour, I "was drenched" by the time I reached shelter."
What can I say instead of "was drenched"?
You can use alternatives like "was soaked", "was saturated", or "was completely wet" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "was drenched" or "had been drenched"?
"Was drenched" describes a state in the past, while "had been drenched" describes a state that occurred before another point in the past. Choose the tense that accurately reflects the sequence of events.
What's the difference between "was drenched" and "was wet"?
"Was wet" simply indicates the presence of moisture. "Was drenched" implies a more thorough and often sudden or forceful soaking. Something that ""was drenched"" is very wet.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested