was settled with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was settled with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a dispute or issue has been resolved or agreed upon with someone or something. Example: "The contract dispute was settled with a mutual agreement between both parties."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The game was settled with two goals in two minutes.

The Guardian - Sport

(The suit was settled with an undisclosed agreement).

The New York Times - Arts

That suit was settled with a consent decree.

The New York Times

He said the matter was settled with the agency for a "nominal" sum.

The New York Times

Mr. Silverman said the case was settled with a "noncriminal violation".

The New York Times

One issue that was settled with relative ease was land reform.

Encyclopedia Britannica

(After years of appeals, the case was settled with a no-contest plea).

The New York Times - Health

Ultimately the dispute was settled with a deal known as the Compromise of 1877.

The New York Times

The town agreed, and the lawsuit was settled with his subsequent purchase of the property.

The New York Times

The dispute was settled, with Galvin permitted to work at the tracks.

The New York Times - Sports

The case was settled with the disgruntled buyer collecting a multimillion payout.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was settled with", ensure the object following "with" clearly indicates the means, agreement, or consideration that led to the resolution.

Common error

Avoid using "was settled by" when "was settled with" is more appropriate. "By" typically indicates the actor, while "with" indicates the terms or means of settlement. For example, say "the lawsuit was settled with a payment" instead of "by a payment".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was settled with" functions as a passive construction indicating the resolution of an issue or dispute. It highlights the means or terms by which the settlement was achieved. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples where this phrase is used to describe legal settlements, agreements, and resolutions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Wiki

22%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Science

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was settled with" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase that indicates the resolution of an issue, specifically highlighting the means or terms by which the settlement occurred. Ludwig AI indicates that it is prevalent in news, encyclopedias, and wiki contexts, suitable for a neutral register. When using this phrase, ensure that the object following "with" accurately reflects the agreement or action that led to the settlement. Alternatives like "was resolved through" or "was agreed upon with" may be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was agreed upon with

Stresses mutual agreement and consent in reaching a settlement.

was settled via

More generic; 'via' suggests a means or channel through which it was settled.

was resolved through

Focuses on the method of resolution rather than the outcome.

was addressed through

Suggests the issue was handled or dealt with using a specific approach.

was concluded by

Emphasizes the action of concluding or finalizing an agreement.

was determined by

Highlights that the outcome depended on a particular factor or decision.

was rectified by

Implies that something was made right or corrected through a certain action.

was mediated by

Indicates a third party facilitated the resolution process.

was negotiated via

Points to negotiation as the primary means of reaching an agreement.

was arbitrated with

Suggests a formal arbitration process led to the settlement.

FAQs

How can I use "was settled with" in a sentence?

The phrase "was settled with" is used to indicate that a disagreement or issue has been resolved through a particular means or agreement. For example, "The legal dispute "was settled with" a financial agreement".

What are some alternatives to "was settled with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "was resolved through", "was concluded by", or "was agreed upon with".

Is it correct to say "was settled by" instead of "was settled with"?

While both phrases can be used, "was settled with" typically indicates the terms or means of the settlement, whereas "was settled by" suggests the actor who settled it. The correct choice depends on the intended meaning.

What does it mean when a case "was settled with" no admission of wrongdoing?

It means that the parties involved reached an agreement to resolve the dispute, but the defendant did not admit to any fault or liability. This is a common outcome in many legal settlements.